• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道指检与产时超声检查在器械助产分娩前确定胎儿头部位置的比较。

Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery.

作者信息

Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides K H

机构信息

Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;21(5):437-40. doi: 10.1002/uog.103.

DOI:10.1002/uog.103
PMID:12768552
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the accuracy of intrapartum transvaginal digital examination in defining the position of the fetal head before instrumental delivery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 64 singleton pregnancies undergoing instrumental delivery the fetal head position was determined by transvaginal digital examination by the attending obstetrician. Immediately after or before the clinical examination, the fetal head position was determined by transabdominal ultrasound by a trained sonographer who was not aware of the clinical findings. The digital examination was considered to be correct if the fetal head position was within +/- 45 degrees of the ultrasound finding. The accuracy of the digital examination was examined in relation to maternal and fetal characteristics.

RESULTS

Digital examination failed to define the correct fetal head position in 17 (26.6%) cases. In 12 of 17 (70.6%) errors the difference was >/= 90 degrees and in five (29.4%) the difference was between 45 degrees and 90 degrees. The accuracy of vaginal digital examination was 83% for occiput-anterior and 54% for occiput-lateral + occiput-posterior positions. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant independent contributions in explaining the variance in the accuracy of vaginal examination for the station of the fetal head, the position of the fetal head and the experience of the examining obstetrician.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital examination during instrumental delivery fails to identify the correct fetal head position in about one quarter of cases.

摘要

目的

探讨产时经阴道指诊在器械助产术前确定胎头位置的准确性。

患者与方法

对64例单胎妊娠行器械助产术的产妇,由主治产科医生经阴道指诊确定胎头位置。在临床检查之后或之前,由一名不知临床检查结果的受过培训的超声医师经腹部超声确定胎头位置。如果胎头位置与超声检查结果相差在±45度以内,则认为指诊正确。根据母体和胎儿特征对指诊的准确性进行检查。

结果

17例(26.6%)指诊未能确定正确的胎头位置。在17例错误中,12例(70.6%)相差≥90度,5例(29.4%)相差在45度至90度之间。枕前位时经阴道指诊的准确性为83%,枕侧位+枕后位时为54%。逻辑回归分析表明,胎头先露部位、胎头位置及检查产科医生的经验对解释阴道检查准确性的差异有显著的独立作用。

结论

器械助产术时的指诊在约四分之一的病例中无法确定正确的胎头位置。

相似文献

1
Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery.经阴道指检与产时超声检查在器械助产分娩前确定胎儿头部位置的比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;21(5):437-40. doi: 10.1002/uog.103.
2
Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor.产时胎儿头部位置I:活跃期经阴道指诊与经腹超声评估的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):258-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x.
3
Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor.产时胎儿头部位置II:第二产程中经阴道指诊与经腹超声评估的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):264-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x.
4
Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations.产时胎儿头部入盆评估:经阴道指诊与经腹超声测定的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;21(5):430-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.102.
5
Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination.第二产程中胎儿头部位置:指诊阴道检查与经腹超声检查的比较
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Dec 1;123(2):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009. Epub 2005 May 31.
6
Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor.分娩期间数字检查与经腹超声检查确定胎儿头部位置的学习曲线比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;31(3):332-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.5267.
7
Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.胎儿头部下降的超声图像模式:与第二产程活跃期时长及分娩时枕部位置的关系
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;44(1):82-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.13324. Epub 2014 May 28.
8
Randomised Italian Sonography for occiput POSition Trial Ante vacuum (R.I.S.POS.T.A.).随机意大利超声检查胎儿枕骨后位试验前真空法(R.I.S.P.O.S.T.A.)。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;52(6):699-705. doi: 10.1002/uog.19091. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
9
Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor.经阴道超声检查与指诊及经腹超声检查在分娩第二产程中确定胎头位置的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;193(2):381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.011.
10
[Indications and prerequisites for operative vaginal delivery: when, how and where?].[手术阴道分娩的适应症和先决条件:何时、如何及何地?]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Dec;37 Suppl 8:S188-201. doi: 10.1016/S0368-2315(08)74757-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the difficulty of forceps delivery using a transperineal ultrasonographic station: a prospective cohort study.使用经会阴超声定位评估产钳助产的难度:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s10396-025-01536-1.
2
Fetal rotation examined with ultrasound in a sub-Saharan population: A longitudinal cohort study.在撒哈拉以南地区人群中通过超声检查胎儿旋转情况:一项纵向队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):225-234. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15013. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
3
Intrapartum Ultrasound Guidance to Make Safer Any Obstetric Intervention: Fetal Head Rotation, Assisted Vaginal Birth, Breech Delivery of the Second Twin.
产时超声引导以实现更安全的产科干预:胎儿头位旋转、辅助阴道分娩、第二胎儿臀位分娩。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Dec 1;67(4):730-738. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000891. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
4
Associations between fetal position at delivery and duration of active phase of labor: A historical cohort study.分娩时胎儿位置与活跃期时长的关系:一项历史性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Sep;103(9):1888-1897. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14929. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Shaping ultrasound in midwifery: towards an evidence-based training framework for enhanced prenatal care.塑造助产超声:迈向基于证据的培训框架,以增强产前护理。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jul;310(1):23-43. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07558-3. Epub 2024 May 21.
6
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Second Stage of Labor according to the Mode of Delivery: A Prospective Study in Greece.根据分娩方式对第二产程进行超声评估:希腊的一项前瞻性研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 13;13(4):1068. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041068.
7
Accurate evaluation of the progress of delivery with transperineal ultrasound may improve vaginal delivery: a single-center retrospective study.经会阴超声对分娩进展的准确评估可能会改善阴道分娩:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47457-2.
8
Sonographic examination at the beginning of the second stage of labor predicts birth outcome in vaginally intended breech deliveries: a blinded prospective study.第二产程初产妇超声检查预测阴道分娩臀位结局:一项盲法前瞻性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1333-1340. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07011-x. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
9
Can Intrapartum Ultrasonography Improve the Placement of the Vacuum Cup in Operative Vaginal Deliveries?产时超声检查能否改善真空吸引器在经阴道分娩中的放置位置?
Tomography. 2023 Jan 27;9(1):247-254. doi: 10.3390/tomography9010019.
10
How to Reach the Best Ultrasound Performance in the Delivery Room.如何在产房达到最佳超声表现。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;44(11):1070-1077. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759773. Epub 2022 Dec 29.