Suppr超能文献

医生的注意义务与循证医学之间是否存在冲突?

Is there a tension between doctors' duty of care and evidence-based medicine?

作者信息

Rogers Wendy A

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Flinders University, Australia.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2002;10(3):277-87. doi: 10.1023/A:1022999724081.

Abstract

The interaction between evidence-based medicine and doctors' duty of care to patients is complex. One the one hand, there is surely an obligation to take account of the best available evidence when offering health care to patients. On the other hand, it is equally important to be aware of important shortcomings in the processes and practices of evidence-based medicine. There are tensions between the population focus of evidence-based medicine and the duties that doctors have to individual patients. Implementing evidence-based medicine may have unpredictable consequences upon the overall quality of health care. Patients may have a range of reasons for preferring one form of treatment over another, not all of which are captured by current formulations of evidence. This paper examines these issues, using relevant examples from evidence-based medicine.

摘要

循证医学与医生对患者的照护职责之间的相互作用是复杂的。一方面,在为患者提供医疗服务时,考虑现有最佳证据肯定是一项义务。另一方面,认识到循证医学的过程和实践中的重要缺陷同样重要。循证医学以人群为重点与医生对个体患者的职责之间存在紧张关系。实施循证医学可能会对医疗保健的整体质量产生不可预测的后果。患者可能有一系列理由更喜欢一种治疗方式而不是另一种,并非所有这些理由都能被当前的证据表述所涵盖。本文将利用循证医学的相关实例来探讨这些问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验