Boulétreau M, Mesquita A L.M., Fouillet P, Fauvergue X
UMR 2558, Biométrie, Génétique et Biologie des Populations, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622, Villeurbanne, France
J Insect Physiol. 1998 Jul;44(7-8):667-675. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(97)00172-8.
We studied male locomotory response to trails and patches of sex pheromone (left respectively by free-ranging females and females constrained to stay on a small area) in the two parasitoids Aphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Under the hypothesis that the spatial distribution of virgin females differs between these species (scattered among host plants in A. asychis, gregarious at emergence sites in T. brassicae), we predicted that male locomotory response to their sex pheromones should also differ: A. asychis males should follow pheromone trails on plants in order to encounter the females along these trails, whereas T. brassicae males should stay on pheromone patches, at emergence sites, and mate the females on these patches. Using an improved video-tracking system, we found that males of both species respond to conspecific sex pheromone trails and patches, but that the response does not differ much between species. Males released on marked substrates walked in a more convoluted pattern (i.e. higher path fractal dimension and higher number of crossings within tracks) than males released on unmarked substrates. On pheromone patches, males turned persistently in the same direction when leaving the patch, which explains a higher number of visits on marked patches than on unmarked patches, and possibly, higher track convolution on pheromone trails. Contrary to our hypothesis, male A. asychis did not follow female trails more accurately than male T. brassicae, and male T. brassicae did not stay longer on pheromone patches than male A. asychis. We argue that these discrepancies between our predictions and the observed responses originates from discrepancies between the assumed spatial distribution of virgin females and their actual distribution in the wild.
我们研究了两种寄生蜂,即浅黄蚜小蜂(膜翅目:蚜小蜂科)和甘蓝赤眼蜂(膜翅目:赤眼蜂科)的雄蜂对性信息素痕迹及斑块(分别由自由活动的雌蜂和被限制在小区域内的雌蜂留下)的运动反应。基于处女雌蜂的空间分布在这两个物种中存在差异的假设(浅黄蚜小蜂分散在寄主植物之间,甘蓝赤眼蜂在羽化地点聚集),我们预测雄蜂对其性信息素的运动反应也应有所不同:浅黄蚜小蜂的雄蜂应沿着植物上的信息素痕迹追踪,以便在这些痕迹上遇到雌蜂,而甘蓝赤眼蜂的雄蜂应停留在信息素斑块上,即在羽化地点,并与这些斑块上的雌蜂交配。使用改进的视频跟踪系统,我们发现这两个物种的雄蜂都对同种性信息素痕迹和斑块有反应,但物种间的反应差异不大。在有标记的基质上释放的雄蜂比在无标记的基质上释放的雄蜂行走模式更复杂(即路径分形维数更高,轨迹内交叉次数更多)。在信息素斑块上,雄蜂离开斑块时会持续朝同一方向转弯,这解释了在有标记斑块上的访问次数比无标记斑块上更多,并且可能在信息素痕迹上轨迹更复杂。与我们的假设相反,浅黄蚜小蜂的雄蜂追踪雌蜂痕迹的准确性并不比甘蓝赤眼蜂的雄蜂更高,并且甘蓝赤眼蜂的雄蜂在信息素斑块上停留的时间也不比浅黄蚜小蜂的雄蜂更长。我们认为,我们的预测与观察到的反应之间的这些差异源于假设的处女雌蜂空间分布与其在野外的实际分布之间的差异。