Quirin H, Schaeffer G, Kluthe R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1976 Jun 11;101(24):923-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1104189.
Controlled balance studies were performed in 12 oedema-free patients with advanced chronic renal failure with optimal dietary pretreatment. Forced water diuresis did not result in a significantly increased urea excretion as compared with spontaneous diuresis. Furosemide diuresis resulted in a significant increase (P less than 0.05) which was irrelevant therapeutically. The serum urea may even increase slightly under furosemide due to massive fluid loss. During thirst-regulated diuresis of advanced chronic renal failure urea back-diffusion is probably already reduced to a minimum. Normal hydration provided, forced water diuresis (oral or parenteral fluid) is useless and irresponsible as it poses additional risks in such patients. Furosemide in high dosage in over-hydrated patients is an effective diuretic even in advanced renal failure. The slightly significant increase in urea excretion during furosemide treatment does not result in important benefits in dietetically well treated patients.
对12例无水肿的晚期慢性肾衰竭患者进行了对照平衡研究,这些患者接受了最佳饮食预处理。与自发利尿相比,强制水利尿并未导致尿素排泄显著增加。速尿利尿导致显著增加(P小于0.05),但在治疗上并无关联。由于大量液体流失,速尿治疗期间血清尿素甚至可能略有升高。在晚期慢性肾衰竭的口渴调节利尿过程中,尿素的反向扩散可能已降至最低。在提供正常水合作用的情况下,强制水利尿(口服或胃肠外补液)是无用且不负责任的,因为这会给此类患者带来额外风险。即使在晚期肾衰竭中,高剂量速尿对水合过度的患者也是一种有效的利尿剂。速尿治疗期间尿素排泄的轻微显著增加,在饮食治疗良好的患者中并未带来重要益处。