Suppr超能文献

吸氧是否延误了适当的呼吸护理?关于氧疗的谬误。

Has oxygen administration delayed appropriate respiratory care? Fallacies regarding oxygen therapy.

作者信息

Downs John B

机构信息

University of South Florida College of Medicine, 917 Guisando De Avila, Tampa, FL 33613, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2003 Jun;48(6):611-20.

Abstract

Modern clinical use of supplemental oxygen supposes that: (1) exposure to F(IO)(2) < or = 60% is without adverse effects, (2) an individual at risk of developing arterial hypoxemia can be protected by administering high F(IO)(2), and (3) routine administration of supplemental oxygen is useful, harmless, and clinically indicated. There is now substantial evidence that none of those 3 suppositions are correct, and, on the contrary, supplemental oxygen is actually detrimental to many of the patients who receive it. Supplemental oxygen is much overused and its use should be limited to the few conditions and situations in which it is truly effective, useful, and non-detrimental.

摘要

现代临床补充氧气的使用基于以下假设

(1)吸入氧分数(F(IO)(2))≤60% 无不良影响;(2)有发生动脉血氧不足风险的个体可通过给予高F(IO)(2)得到保护;(3)常规补充氧气有益、无害且具有临床指征。现在有大量证据表明,这三个假设均不正确,相反,补充氧气实际上对许多接受者有害。补充氧气被过度使用,其使用应仅限于少数真正有效、有益且无害的情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验