Downs John B
University of South Florida College of Medicine, 917 Guisando De Avila, Tampa, FL 33613, USA.
Respir Care. 2003 Jun;48(6):611-20.
Modern clinical use of supplemental oxygen supposes that: (1) exposure to F(IO)(2) < or = 60% is without adverse effects, (2) an individual at risk of developing arterial hypoxemia can be protected by administering high F(IO)(2), and (3) routine administration of supplemental oxygen is useful, harmless, and clinically indicated. There is now substantial evidence that none of those 3 suppositions are correct, and, on the contrary, supplemental oxygen is actually detrimental to many of the patients who receive it. Supplemental oxygen is much overused and its use should be limited to the few conditions and situations in which it is truly effective, useful, and non-detrimental.
(1)吸入氧分数(F(IO)(2))≤60% 无不良影响;(2)有发生动脉血氧不足风险的个体可通过给予高F(IO)(2)得到保护;(3)常规补充氧气有益、无害且具有临床指征。现在有大量证据表明,这三个假设均不正确,相反,补充氧气实际上对许多接受者有害。补充氧气被过度使用,其使用应仅限于少数真正有效、有益且无害的情况。