Ferguson Susan H, Franzmann Peter D, Snape Ian, Revill Andrew T, Trefry Michael G, Zappia Luke R
University of Tasmania, P.O. Box 252-76, 7001, Hobart, Australia.
Chemosphere. 2003 Aug;52(6):975-87. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00265-0.
Although petroleum contamination has been identified at many Antarctic research stations, and is recognized as posing a significant threat to the Antarctic environment, full-scale in situ remediation has not yet been used in Antarctica. This is partly because it has been assumed that temperatures are too low for effective biodegradation. To test this, the effects of temperature on the hydrocarbon mineralisation rate in Antarctic terrestrial sediments were quantified. 14C-labelled octadecane was added to nutrient amended microcosms that were incubated over a range of temperatures between -2 and 42 degrees C. We found a positive correlation between temperature and mineralisation rate, with the fastest rates occurring in samples incubated at the highest temperatures. At temperatures below or near the freezing point of water there was a virtual absence of mineralisation. High temperatures (37 and 42 degrees C) and the temperatures just above the freezing point of water (4 degrees C) showed an initial mineralisation lag period, then a sharp increase in the mineralisation rate before a protracted plateau phase. Mineralisation at temperatures between 10 and 28 degrees C had no initial lag phase. The high rate of mineralisation at 37 and 42 degrees C was surprising, as most continental Antarctic microorganisms described thus far have an optimal temperature for growth of between 20 and 30 degrees C and a maximal growth temperature <37 degrees C. The main implications for bioremediation in Antarctica from this study are that a high-temperature treatment would yield the most rapid biodegradation of the contaminant. However, in situ biodegradation using nutrients and other amendments is still possible at soil temperatures that occur naturally in summer at the Antarctic site we studies (Casey Station 66 degrees 17(') S, 110 degrees 32(') E), although treatment times could be excessively long.
尽管在许多南极研究站都已发现石油污染,并且石油污染被认为对南极环境构成重大威胁,但南极尚未采用全面的原位修复方法。部分原因是人们认为温度过低,无法进行有效的生物降解。为了验证这一点,研究人员对温度对南极陆地沉积物中碳氢化合物矿化速率的影响进行了量化。将14C标记的十八烷添加到添加了营养物质的微观环境中,并在-2至42摄氏度的一系列温度下进行培养。我们发现温度与矿化速率之间呈正相关,在最高温度下培养的样品中矿化速率最快。在低于或接近水的冰点的温度下,几乎没有矿化现象。高温(37和42摄氏度)以及略高于水的冰点的温度(4摄氏度)显示出初始矿化滞后期,然后矿化速率急剧增加,随后是一个持续的平稳阶段。在10至28摄氏度之间的温度下进行矿化没有初始滞后期。在37和42摄氏度下的高矿化速率令人惊讶,因为迄今为止描述的大多数南极大陆微生物的最佳生长温度在20至30摄氏度之间,最大生长温度<37摄氏度。这项研究对南极生物修复的主要启示是,高温处理将使污染物的生物降解速度最快。然而,在我们研究的南极站点(凯西站,南纬66度17分,东经110度32分)夏季自然出现的土壤温度下,使用营养物质和其他改良剂进行原位生物降解仍然是可能的,尽管处理时间可能会过长。