Livraghi Tito, Solbiati Luigi, Meloni Franca, Ierace Tiziana, Goldberg S Nahum, Gazelle G Scott
Department of Radiology, Ospedale Civile, Vimercate (MI), Italy.
Cancer. 2003 Jun 15;97(12):3027-35. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11426.
Some surgeons have advocated delaying resection of liver metastases to allow additional metastases which may be present, but are undetected, to be identified. This "test-of-time" approach can limit the number of resections performed on patients who ultimately will develop additional metastases. The current study evaluated the potential role and possible advantages of performing radiofrequency (RF) ablation during the interval between diagnosis and hepatic metastasectomy as part of a test-of-time management approach.
Eighty-eight consecutive patients with 134 colorectal carcinoma liver metastases were potential candidates for hepatic metastasectomy. They were treated with percutaneous RF ablation using single (101 treatments) or triple-probe cluster (22 treatments) 18-gauge internally cooled electrodes. Treatment was performed under conscious sedation (22 of 119 treatments), anesthesia (14 of 119 treatments), or general anesthesia (83 of 119 treatments). At the time of the initial RF ablation procedure, 49 of 88 patients (56%) were found to have 1 metastasis, 32 of 88 patients (36%) had 2 metastases, and 7 of 88 patients (8%) had 3 metastases. Metastases ranged from 0.6 to 4.0 cm in greatest dimension (mean, 2.1 cm). Follow-up with serial computed tomography scans scans ranged from 18 to 75 months (median, 33 months) after the initial RF ablation.
A total of 119 RF ablations were performed. Complete necrosis was obtained in 53 of 88 patients (60%) and in 85 of 134 lesions (63%). During follow-up of these 53 patients, 16 (30%) remained free of disease and 37 (70%) developed new lesions. New lesions were intrahepatic in 26 of 37 patients (70%), extrahepatic in 4 patients (11%), and both intrahepatic and extrahepatic in 7 patients (19%). Of 26 patients whose new lesions were intrahepatic only, 15 (58%) were retreated with RF and 7 were free of disease at the time of last follow-up (median follow-up, 28 months). Ten additional patients with only intrahepatic new lesions were deemed untreatable and 1 patient underwent resection. Overall, among the 53 patients in whom complete tumor necrosis was achieved after RF ablation therapy, 52 (98%) were spared surgical resection: 23 (44%) because they have remained free of disease and 29 (56%) because they developed disease progression. Among all 88 patients, 21 (24%) underwent resection after RF ablation (8 were free of disease at the time of last follow-up), 23 (26%) remained free of disease after successful RF ablation, and 56 (64%) developed untreatable disease progression (44 after RF alone, 12 after RF and surgery). Lesions in 35 of 88 patients (40%) demonstrated local tumor recurrence on follow-up imaging studies. Twenty of these 35 patients (57%) underwent surgical resection, whereas the remaining 15 patients (43%) developed additional, untreatable metastases. New lesions were intrahepatic in 9 of 15 patients (60%), extrahepatic in 1 of 15 patients (7%), and both intrahepatic and extrahepatic in 5 of 15 patients (33%). No patient who had been treated with RF ablation became unresectable due to the growth of metastases and there was no evidence of needle track seeding in any patient after RF ablation. Overall, among the 35 patients in whom complete tumor necrosis was not achieved after RF ablation therapy, 15 (43%) were spared surgical resection.
The results of the current study suggest that current RF ablation techniques, when used as part of a test-of-time management approach, can decrease the number of resections performed. The approach results in complete tumor necrosis in some patients and provide an interval for others who ultimately will develop new intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic metastases to do so.
一些外科医生主张延迟肝转移瘤切除术,以便发现可能存在但未被检测到的其他转移瘤。这种“时间检验”方法可以减少对最终会出现更多转移瘤的患者进行的切除手术数量。本研究评估了在诊断和肝转移瘤切除术之间的间隔期进行射频(RF)消融作为时间检验管理方法一部分的潜在作用和可能的优势。
连续88例患有134处结直肠癌肝转移瘤的患者是肝转移瘤切除术的潜在候选者。他们使用单根(101次治疗)或三探针簇状(22次治疗)18号内部冷却电极进行经皮RF消融治疗。治疗在清醒镇静(119次治疗中的22次)、麻醉(119次治疗中的14次)或全身麻醉(119次治疗中的83次)下进行。在首次RF消融手术时,88例患者中有49例(56%)发现有1处转移瘤,88例患者中有32例(36%)有2处转移瘤,88例患者中有7例(8%)有3处转移瘤。转移瘤最大直径为0.6至4.0厘米(平均2.1厘米)。首次RF消融后,通过连续计算机断层扫描进行的随访时间为18至75个月(中位数为33个月)。
共进行了119次RF消融。88例患者中有53例(60%)以及134处病灶中有85处(63%)实现了完全坏死。在这53例患者的随访期间,16例(30%)无疾病进展,37例(70%)出现了新病灶。37例患者中有26例(70%)的新病灶位于肝内,4例(11%)位于肝外,7例(19%)肝内和肝外均有。在26例新病灶仅位于肝内的患者中,15例(58%)接受了RF再次治疗,7例在最后一次随访时(中位随访时间28个月)无疾病进展。另外10例仅肝内有新病灶的患者被认为无法治疗,1例患者接受了切除术。总体而言,在RF消融治疗后实现完全肿瘤坏死的53例患者中,52例(98%)免于手术切除:23例(44%)是因为无疾病进展,29例(56%)是因为出现了疾病进展。在所有88例患者中,21例(24%)在RF消融后接受了切除术(8例在最后一次随访时无疾病进展),23例(26%)在成功的RF消融后无疾病进展,56例(64%)出现了无法治疗的疾病进展(44例仅在RF消融后出现,12例在RF消融和手术后出现)。88例患者中有35例(40%)的病灶在随访影像学检查中显示局部肿瘤复发。这35例患者中有20例(57%)接受了手术切除,其余15例(43%)出现了更多无法治疗的转移瘤。15例患者中有9例(60%)的新病灶位于肝内,15例中有1例(7%)位于肝外,15例中有5例(33%)肝内和肝外均有。接受RF消融治疗的患者中没有因转移瘤生长而无法进行手术切除的情况,且RF消融后任何患者均无针道种植的证据。总体而言,在RF消融治疗后未实现完全肿瘤坏死的35例患者中,15例(43%)免于手术切除。
本研究结果表明,当前的RF消融技术作为时间检验管理方法的一部分使用时,可以减少切除手术的数量。该方法可使部分患者实现完全肿瘤坏死,并为其他最终会出现新的肝内和/或肝外转移瘤的患者提供一个间隔期。