Cantor Scott B, Elting Linda S, Hudson David V, Rubenstein Edward B
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-4009, USA.
Cancer. 2003 Jun 15;97(12):3099-106. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11447.
Previous research has shown oprelvekin (recombinant human interleukin-11 [rhIL-11]) to be effective in reducing the requirements for platelet transfusions after myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients who have previously experienced thrombocytopenia. The economic consequences of the routine use of this platelet growth factor and the usual standard of platelet transfusions for prophylaxis of severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia have not been compared.
The authors constructed a decision-analytic model to compare the alternatives of rhIL-11 versus usual care using probability, outcome, and cost data from previously published clinical trials and their own institutional sources. They incorporated the costs of platelet transfusions and adverse events from rhIL-11 into the analysis. Quality-of-life outcomes were not considered. The pharmacoeconomic analysis was based on the criterion of cost minimization from the payer's perspective.
The expected cost of the usual care strategy for prophylaxis of severe thrombocytopenia (transfusion when platelets < 20000 microL(-1)) was US dollars 3495 for a 3-week cycle of chemotherapy. The prophylactic rhIL-11 strategy was more expensive, with an expected cost of US dollars 5328 over the same time period. Nonetheless, it was associated with fewer platelet transfusions, avoiding an average of 6.7 U compared with usual care. The savings from avoidance of platelet transfusion and adverse reactions to transfusion from the use of rhIL-11 were not offset by the substantial cost of the pharmaceutical. The greater expected costs from the rhIL-11 strategy were relatively insensitive to the unit price and efficacy of rhIL-11 and the costs of platelet transfusions and monitoring.
From the payer's perspective, rhIL-11 cannot be considered a cost-saving clinical strategy compared with routine platelet transfusions for patients with severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.
既往研究表明,奥普瑞白介素(重组人白细胞介素-11 [rhIL-11])对于既往有血小板减少症的患者在骨髓抑制性化疗后减少血小板输注需求方面有效。尚未比较过常规使用这种血小板生长因子与通常的血小板输注标准用于预防严重化疗所致血小板减少症的经济后果。
作者构建了一个决策分析模型,使用先前发表的临床试验及自身机构来源的概率、结果和成本数据,比较rhIL-11与常规治疗的替代方案。他们将血小板输注成本和rhIL-11的不良事件纳入分析。未考虑生活质量结果。药物经济学分析基于从支付方角度的成本最小化标准。
对于为期3周的化疗周期,预防严重血小板减少症(血小板<20000 μL⁻¹时输血)的常规治疗策略的预期成本为3495美元。预防性使用rhIL-11策略成本更高,同期预期成本为5328美元。尽管如此,其与较少的血小板输注相关,与常规治疗相比平均避免了6.7单位的输注。使用rhIL-11避免血小板输注及输血不良反应所节省的费用并未被药物的高昂成本所抵消。rhIL-11策略更高的预期成本对rhIL-11的单价和疗效以及血小板输注和监测成本相对不敏感。
从支付方角度来看,对于严重化疗所致血小板减少症患者,与常规血小板输注相比,rhIL-11不能被视为一种节省成本的临床策略。