Trueman David L
Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, USA.
J Health Law. 2003 Winter;36(1):107-32.
Over the past two decades, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) has shielded managed care organizations (MCOs) from liability for negligent treatment or coverage decisions. This Article examines the Supreme Court jurisprudence in the area of ERISA preemption, and assesses the impact of these recent decisions on state regulation of MCOs. The author concludes that recent decisions in Pegram v. Herdrich and Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran have broadened the states' power to regulate MCOs and enhance the ability of injured plaintiffs to sue such organizations under state tort law.
在过去二十年里,1974年的《员工退休收入保障法》(ERISA)使管理式医疗组织(MCOs)免受因疏忽治疗或承保决策而产生的责任。本文审视了最高法院在ERISA优先适用领域的判例法,并评估了这些近期判决对州政府对MCOs监管的影响。作者得出结论,佩格拉姆诉赫德里奇案和拉什保诚健康维护组织公司诉莫兰案中的近期判决扩大了各州监管MCOs的权力,并增强了受伤害的原告依据州侵权法起诉此类组织的能力。