Fischer Martin H, Pratt Jay, Neggers Sebastiaan F W
University of Munich.
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Apr;65(3):379-87. doi: 10.3758/bf03194569.
To examine whether the motor inhibition of return (IOR) postulated by Taylor and Klein (1998, 2000) generalizes to manual guided movements or is restricted to saccadic responses, the following three experiments were conducted. The first experiment combined peripheral cues (which generate IOR) with four types of manual responses made to central targets (central arrow indicating the response location). The responses were made on a touch-screen and were the equivalent of either a detection keypress, a choice keypress, a detection-guided pointing movement, or a choice-guided pointing movement. No IOR was found for any of the responses. The second experiment replicated the main result under eye fixation control. In Experiment 3, peripheral cues and peripheral targets were used, and IOR was present in all responses. Overall, these finding suggest that motor-based IOR is restricted to the oculomotor system. Implications for motor-based IOR and attention-based IOR are discussed.
为了检验泰勒和克莱因(1998年、2000年)所假设的运动返回抑制(IOR)是否适用于手动引导运动,还是仅限于眼跳反应,进行了以下三个实验。第一个实验将外周线索(产生IOR)与对中央目标做出的四种手动反应相结合(中央箭头指示反应位置)。反应在触摸屏上进行,相当于检测按键、选择按键、检测引导的指向运动或选择引导的指向运动。在任何一种反应中均未发现IOR。第二个实验在眼动固定控制下重复了主要结果。在实验3中,使用了外周线索和外周目标,并且在所有反应中都存在IOR。总体而言,这些发现表明基于运动的IOR仅限于动眼系统。讨论了基于运动的IOR和基于注意力的IOR的意义。