Avery Brittany, Cowper-Smith Christopher D, Westwood David A
Division of Kinesiology, Dalhousie University, 6230 South Street, P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Nov;233(11):3283-90. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4396-4. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
We have shown that the latency to initiate a reaching movement is increased if its direction is the same as a previous movement compared to movements that differ by 90° or 180° (Cowper-Smith and Westwood in Atten Percept Psychophys 75:1914-1922, 2013). An influential study (Taylor and Klein in J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1639-1656, 2000), however, reported the opposite spatial pattern for manual keypress responses: repeated responses on the same side had reduced reaction time compared to responses on opposite sides. In order to determine whether there are fundamental differences in the patterns of spatial interactions between button-pressing responses and reaching movements, we compared both types of manual responses using common methods. Reaching movements and manual keypress responses were performed in separate blocks of trials using consecutive central arrow stimuli that directed participants to respond to left or right targets. Reaction times were greater for manual responses made to the same target as a previous response (M = 390 ms) as compared to the opposite target (M = 365 ms; similarity main effect: p < 0.001) regardless of whether the response was a reaching movement or a keypress response. This finding is broadly consistent with an inhibitory mechanism operating at the level of motor output that discourages movements that achieve the same spatial goal as a recent action.
我们已经表明,如果伸手动作的方向与先前动作相同,那么与方向相差90°或180°的动作相比,启动该伸手动作的潜伏期会增加(考珀 - 史密斯和韦斯特伍德,《注意、感知与心理物理学》,2013年,第75卷,第1914 - 1922页)。然而,一项有影响力的研究(泰勒和克莱因,《实验心理学:人类感知与表现》,2000年,第26卷,第1639 - 1656页)报告了手动按键反应的相反空间模式:与对侧的反应相比,同侧的重复反应反应时间缩短。为了确定按键反应和伸手动作之间的空间交互模式是否存在根本差异,我们使用通用方法比较了这两种手动反应类型。伸手动作和手动按键反应在单独的试验块中进行,使用连续的中央箭头刺激引导参与者对左侧或右侧目标做出反应。与对相反目标的反应(M = 365毫秒)相比,对与先前反应相同目标的手动反应(M = 390毫秒)的反应时间更长(相似性主效应:p < 0.001),无论反应是伸手动作还是按键反应。这一发现与一种在运动输出水平起作用的抑制机制大致一致,该机制不鼓励实现与近期动作相同空间目标的动作。