Suppr超能文献

一项关于使用封闭式与开放式吸痰系统的患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的前瞻性随机研究。

A prospective, randomized study of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients using a closed vs. open suction system.

作者信息

Zeitoun Sandra Salloum, de Barros Alba Lúcia Botura Leite, Diccini Solange

机构信息

Hospital SEPACO, Nursing Department, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Madre de Deus, 795 ap. 22 São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2003 Jul;12(4):484-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00749.x.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to verify the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in intubated and extended mechanically ventilated patients having endotracheal suctioning by an open vs. closed suction method aiming to decrease nosocomial pneumonia. Twenty-four (51.1%) patients received open-tracheal suction and 23 (48.9%) received closed-tracheal suction. The inclusion criteria were: surgical and medical patients older than 13 years, undergoing mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. Additional data were gathered using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and details on smoking, alcoholism, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, previous lung disease, and previous use of antibiotics, steroids, H2 antagonists and antacids. Among the 24 patients having open-tracheal suction, 11 developed nosocomial pneumonia while of the 23 patients undergoing closed-tracheal suction, seven developed infection (P = 0.278). Risk factors for nosocomial pneumonia were not significantly different between the two groups. In the final logistical regression model the following variables remained: groups (open and closed) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.014; confidence interval (CI) = 0.001-0.416; P = 0.014] and use of prior antibiotics (OR = 2.297; CI = 1.244-4.242; P = 0.008). Use of a closed suction system did not decrease the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia when compared with the open system. The exogenous risk factors were the most important for acquiring this infection.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过开放式与封闭式吸痰方法对气管插管并延长机械通气时间且进行气管内吸痰的患者,验证医院获得性肺炎的发生率,旨在降低医院获得性肺炎。24例(51.1%)患者接受开放式气管吸痰,23例(48.9%)接受封闭式气管吸痰。纳入标准为:年龄大于13岁的外科和内科患者,机械通气时间超过48小时。使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评价II收集其他数据,以及关于吸烟、酗酒、糖尿病、肾衰竭、既往肺部疾病,以及既往使用抗生素、类固醇、H2拮抗剂和抗酸剂的详细信息。在24例接受开放式气管吸痰的患者中,11例发生医院获得性肺炎,而在23例接受封闭式气管吸痰的患者中,7例发生感染(P = 0.278)。两组医院获得性肺炎的危险因素无显著差异。在最终的逻辑回归模型中,以下变量仍然存在:组别(开放式和封闭式)[比值比(OR)= 0.014;置信区间(CI)= 0.001 - 0.416;P = 0.014]和既往使用抗生素(OR = 2.297;CI = 1.244 - 4.242;P = 0.008)。与开放式系统相比,使用封闭式吸痰系统并未降低医院获得性肺炎的发生率。外源性危险因素是获得这种感染的最重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验