Suppr超能文献

“听觉神经病”:生理和病理证据要求更高的诊断特异性。

"Auditory neuropathy": physiologic and pathologic evidence calls for more diagnostic specificity.

作者信息

Rapin Isabelle, Gravel Judith

机构信息

Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, K 807, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Jul;67(7):707-28. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(03)00103-4.

Abstract

The term "auditory neuropathy" is being used in a rapidly increasing number of papers in the audiology/otolaryngology literature for a variety of individuals (mostly children) who fulfill the following criteria: (1) understanding of speech worse than predicted from the degree of hearing loss on their behavioral audiograms; (2) recordable otoacoustic emissions and/or cochlear microphonic; together with (3) absent or atypical auditory brain stem responses. Because of the general lack of anatomic foundation for the label "auditory neuropathy" as currently used, we review the anatomy of the auditory pathway, the definition of neuropathy and its demyelinating, axonal, and mixed variants. We submit that the diagnostic term "auditory neuropathy" is anatomically inappropriate unless patients have documented evidence for selective involvement of either the spiral ganglion cells or their axons, or of the 8th nerve as a whole. In view of biologic differences between peripheral nerves and white matter tracts in the brain, the term "auditory neuropathy" is inappropriate for pathologies affecting the central auditory pathway in the brainstem and brain selectively. Published reports of patients with "auditory neuropathy" indicate that they are extremely heterogeneous in underlying medical diagnosis, age, severity, test results, and that only a small number have undergone the detailed investigations that would enable a more precise diagnosis of the locus of their pathologies. The electrophysiology of peripheral neuropathies and the deficits expected with pathologies affecting the hair cells, spiral ganglion cells and their axons (auditory neuropathy sensu stricto), and brain stem relays are reviewed. In order to serve patients adequately, including potential candidates for cochlear implants, and to increase knowledge of auditory pathologies, we make a plea for more comprehensive evaluation of patients who fulfill the currently used audiologic criteria for "auditory neuropathy" in an effort to pinpoint the site of their pathologies. We suggest that the term auditory neuropathy be limited to cases in which the locus of pathology is limited to the spiral ganglion cells, their processes, or the 8th nerve, and that the term neural hearing loss be considered for pathologies that affect all higher levels of the auditory pathway, from the brainstem to the auditory cortex.

摘要

在听力学/耳鼻喉科学文献中,越来越多的论文使用“听觉神经病”这一术语来描述符合以下标准的各类个体(大多数为儿童):(1)言语理解能力比其行为听力图上听力损失程度所预测的要差;(2)可记录到耳声发射和/或耳蜗微音电位;以及(3)听觉脑干反应缺失或异常。由于目前使用的“听觉神经病”这一标签普遍缺乏解剖学基础,我们回顾了听觉通路的解剖结构、神经病的定义及其脱髓鞘、轴索性和混合型变体。我们认为,除非患者有记录证据表明螺旋神经节细胞或其轴突,或整个第八脑神经有选择性受累情况,否则诊断术语“听觉神经病”在解剖学上是不恰当的。鉴于外周神经与脑内白质束在生物学上存在差异,“听觉神经病”这一术语不适用于选择性影响脑干和脑内中枢听觉通路的病变。关于“听觉神经病”患者的已发表报告表明,他们在潜在医学诊断、年龄、严重程度、检查结果方面极为异质,而且只有少数患者接受了能更精确诊断其病变部位的详细检查。本文回顾了外周神经病的电生理学以及影响毛细胞、螺旋神经节细胞及其轴突(严格意义上的听觉神经病)和脑干传导通路病变所预期出现的缺陷。为了充分服务患者,包括人工耳蜗植入的潜在候选者,并增加对听觉病变的认识,我们呼吁对符合当前“听觉神经病”听力学标准的患者进行更全面的评估,以确定其病变部位。我们建议,“听觉神经病”这一术语应仅限于病变部位局限于螺旋神经节细胞、其突起或第八脑神经的病例,而对于影响从脑干到听觉皮层等所有更高层次听觉通路的病变,应考虑使用“神经性听力损失”这一术语。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验