Suppr超能文献

住院医生会从他们的错误中吸取教训吗?

Do house officers learn from their mistakes?

作者信息

Wu A W, Folkman S, McPhee S J, Lo B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):221-6; discussion 227-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.221.

Abstract

Mistakes are inevitable in medicine. To learn how medical mistakes relate to subsequent changes in practice, we surveyed 254 internal medicine house officers. One hundred and fourteen house officers (45%) completed an anonymous questionnaire describing their most significant mistake and their response to it. Mistakes included errors in diagnosis (33%), prescribing (29%), evaluation (21%), and communication (5%) and procedural complications (11%). Patients had serious adverse outcomes in 90% of the cases, including death in 31% of cases. Only 54% of house officers discussed the mistake with their attending physicians, and only 24% told the patients or families. House officers who accepted responsibility for the mistake and discussed it were more likely to report constructive changes in practice. Residents were less likely to make constructive changes if they attributed the mistake to job overload. They were more likely to report defensive changes if they felt the institution was judgmental. Decreasing the work load and closer supervision may help prevent mistakes. To promote learning, faculty should encourage house officers to accept responsibility and to discuss their mistakes.

摘要

医疗失误在所难免。为了解医疗失误与后续实践变化之间的关系,我们对254名内科住院医师进行了调查。114名住院医师(45%)完成了一份匿名问卷,描述了他们最重大的失误以及对此的应对措施。失误包括诊断错误(33%)、开方错误(29%)、评估错误(21%)、沟通错误(5%)以及操作并发症(11%)。90%的病例中患者出现了严重不良后果,其中31%的病例导致死亡。只有54%的住院医师与他们的主治医师讨论了失误,只有24%告知了患者或家属。对失误承担责任并进行讨论的住院医师更有可能报告实践中的建设性变化。如果住院医师将失误归咎于工作负担过重,他们进行建设性变化的可能性较小。如果他们觉得机构爱评判,就更有可能报告防御性变化。减轻工作量和加强监督可能有助于预防失误。为促进学习,教员应鼓励住院医师承担责任并讨论他们的失误。

相似文献

1
Do house officers learn from their mistakes?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):221-6; discussion 227-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.221.
2
Do house officers learn from their mistakes?
JAMA. 1991 Apr 24;265(16):2089-94.
3
How house officers cope with their mistakes.
West J Med. 1993 Nov;159(5):565-9.
5
How do physicians learn to provide palliative care?
J Palliat Care. 2003 Winter;19(4):246-52.
6
Learning not to take it seriously: junior doctors' accounts of error.
Med Educ. 2008 Oct;42(10):982-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03151.x.
7
Attitudes of house officers toward the autopsy.
J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;5(2):122-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02600512.
9
Reporting and disclosing medical errors: pediatricians' attitudes and behaviors.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Feb;161(2):179-85. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.2.179.
10
Learning from mistakes. Factors that influence how students and residents learn from medical errors.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):419-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00420.x.

引用本文的文献

1
North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey.
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 20;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0.
2
Medical Malpractice in Turkey: Pediatric Cases Resulting in Death.
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2021 Nov;56(6):631-637. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.21152.
3
Effect of malpractice claims on orthopedic and traumatology physicians in Turkey: A survey study.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021 Mar;55(2):171-176. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.20167.
6
The intention to disclose medical errors among doctors in a referral hospital in North Malaysia.
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jan 23;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0161-x.
7
Assessing surgeon behavior change after anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery.
J Surg Res. 2016 Oct;205(2):378-383. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.075. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
8
Educating medical trainees on medication reconciliation: a systematic review.
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Mar 7;15:33. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0306-5.
9
Delinking resident duty hours from patient safety.
BMC Med Educ. 2014;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-S1-S2. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
10
Doctors' experiences of adverse events in secondary care: the professional and personal impact.
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Dec;14(6):585-90. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-6-585.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验