• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院医生会从他们的错误中吸取教训吗?

Do house officers learn from their mistakes?

作者信息

Wu A W, Folkman S, McPhee S J, Lo B

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

JAMA. 1991 Apr 24;265(16):2089-94.

PMID:2013929
Abstract

Mistakes are inevitable in medicine. To learn how medical mistakes relate to subsequent changes in practice, we surveyed 254 internal medicine house officers. One hundred fourteen house officers (45%) completed an anonymous questionnaire describing their most significant mistake and their response to it. Mistakes included errors in diagnosis (33%), prescribing (29%), evaluation (21%), and communication (5%) and procedural complications (11%). Patients had serious adverse outcomes in 90% of the cases, including death in 31% of cases. Only 54% of house officers discussed the mistake with their attending physicians, and only 24% told the patients or families. House officers who accepted responsibility for the mistake and discussed it were more likely to report constructive changes in practice. Residents were less likely to make constructive changes if they attributed the mistake to job overload. They were more likely to report defensive changes if they felt the institution was judgmental. Decreasing the work load and closer supervision may help prevent mistakes. To promote learning, faculty should encourage house officers to accept responsibility and to discuss their mistakes.

摘要

医学中错误在所难免。为了解医疗错误与后续实践变化之间的关系,我们对254名内科住院医师进行了调查。114名住院医师(45%)完成了一份匿名问卷,描述了他们最严重的错误以及对此的应对措施。错误包括诊断错误(33%)、开方错误(29%)、评估错误(21%)、沟通错误(5%)以及操作并发症(11%)。90%的病例中患者出现了严重不良后果,其中31%的病例导致死亡。只有54%的住院医师与他们的主治医生讨论了错误,只有24%告知了患者或家属。对错误承担责任并进行讨论的住院医师更有可能报告实践中的建设性变化。如果住院医师将错误归因于工作负担过重,他们进行建设性改变的可能性较小。如果他们觉得机构爱评判,就更有可能报告防御性改变。减轻工作量和加强监督可能有助于预防错误。为促进学习,教员应鼓励住院医师承担责任并讨论他们的错误。

相似文献

1
Do house officers learn from their mistakes?住院医生会从他们的错误中吸取教训吗?
JAMA. 1991 Apr 24;265(16):2089-94.
2
Do house officers learn from their mistakes?住院医生会从他们的错误中吸取教训吗?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):221-6; discussion 227-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.221.
3
How house officers cope with their mistakes.住院医生如何应对他们的错误。
West J Med. 1993 Nov;159(5):565-9.
4
The heart of darkness: the impact of perceived mistakes on physicians.黑暗之心:感知到的错误对医生的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Jul-Aug;7(4):424-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02599161.
5
Exploring the causes of junior doctors' prescribing mistakes: a qualitative study.探究初级医生开处方错误的原因:一项定性研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Aug;78(2):310-9. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12332.
6
Do house officers learn from their mistakes?住院医生会从他们的错误中吸取教训吗?
JAMA. 1991;266(4):512-3.
7
Attending Physician Performance Measure Scores and Resident Physicians' Ordering Practices.主治医师绩效评估分数与住院医师的医嘱开具行为
JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):813-4. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0891.
8
Differences in outpatient corticosteroid prescribing patterns between attending and house staff physicians as an indicator of the quality of supervision.主治医生和住院医生门诊皮质类固醇处方模式的差异作为监督质量的指标。
Am J Med Qual. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):26-33. doi: 10.1177/106286060001500105.
9
Do faculty and resident physicians discuss their medical errors?教职员工和住院医师会讨论他们的医疗失误吗?
J Med Ethics. 2008 Oct;34(10):717-22. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023713.
10
Shades of blue: the negotiation of limited codes by medical residents.蓝色的色调:住院医师对有限代码的协商
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Apr;34(8):885-98. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90257-q.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness regarding surgical errors, its occurrence and their coping strategies among the surgeons of BPKIHS.博克拉坎蒂医院外科医生对手术失误、其发生情况及其应对策略的认知。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Aug 1;87(9):5442-5447. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003663. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Morbidity and Mortality Conferences of the Philippine General Hospital Department of Surgery: A Survey on the Perception of Surgical Trainees to Improve Patient Safety.菲律宾总医院外科部的发病率和死亡率研讨会:关于外科住院医师对改善患者安全认知的一项调查
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 May 30;59(6):78-84. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.9793. eCollection 2025.
3
Good Saves: How Emergency Medicine Residents are Learning From Success.
成功的挽救:急诊医学住院医师如何从成功中学习。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 27;15(11):e49508. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49508. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Screening Second Victims for Emotional Distress: Assessment of the Clinimetric Properties of the WITHSTAND-PSY Questionnaire.筛查第二受害者的情绪困扰:WITHSTAND-PSY 问卷的计量特性评估。
Psychother Psychosom. 2023;92(6):399-409. doi: 10.1159/000535006. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
5
Characteristics of Dermatology Residency Program Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: A Survey of Program Directors.皮肤科住院医师培训项目发病率与死亡率会议的特点:项目主任调查
JMIR Dermatol. 2023 Jul 31;6:e45194. doi: 10.2196/45194.
6
Perception of the Disclosure of Adverse Events in a Latin American Culture: A National Survey.拉丁美洲文化中不良事件披露的认知:一项全国性调查。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2022 Aug 22;5(3):47-55. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-22-3. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Taking action against medical accidents: A brief history of AvMA and clinical risk management in the NHS.应对医疗事故:英国医疗事故受害者协会(AvMA)及英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)临床风险管理简史
J Patient Saf Risk Manag. 2022 Dec;27(6):248-255. doi: 10.1177/25160435221135120. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
8
Perception of Shame in the Plastic Surgery Field.整形外科领域中的羞耻感认知。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Oct 27;10(10):e4621. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004621. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Knowledge and Competence Towards Critical Care Concepts Among Final Year Medical Students and Interns: A Cross-Sectional Study.医学专业最后一年学生和实习生对重症监护概念的知识与能力:一项横断面研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Sep 19;13:1091-1101. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S372119. eCollection 2022.
10
Knowledge and Confidence of Final-Year Medical Students Regarding Critical Care Core-Concepts, a Comparison between Problem-Based Learning and a Traditional Curriculum.医学专业最后一年学生对重症监护核心概念的了解与信心:基于问题的学习与传统课程的比较
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021 Mar 23;8:2382120521999669. doi: 10.1177/2382120521999669. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.