Armon Carmel
Department of Neurology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Neuroepidemiology. 2003 Jul-Aug;22(4):217-28. doi: 10.1159/000070562.
An evidence-based medicine approach was applied to evaluate analytic studies of exogenous risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) published since 1991. Classification systems for evaluating the literature and for drawing conclusions based on the class of available evidence were developed, modeled on those used by national societies. Considerations regarding the impact on the general public of confirming a role for putative risk factors were made explicit. There was evidence in support of smoking being a probable ('more likely than not') risk factor for ALS. Smoking has broad public health impact, no redeeming features, and is a modifiable risk factor. Evidence supported the conclusion that the following were probably not risk factors for ALS: trauma, physical activity, residence in rural areas and alcohol consumption. Evidence-based medicine methodology does not permit calculation of the magnitude of type I or type II errors in drawing these conclusions. New evidence may change these conclusions. Recommendations for future research include: draw on clinical trial methodology in designing future, confirmatory, case-control studies; consider utilizing cohort studies, recognizing the longer timelines for these to come to fruition; accord priority to investigating putative risk factors with greatest public health impact. Advances in study methodology may lead to development of finite research cycles for individual putative risk factors for sporadic ALS.
采用循证医学方法对自1991年以来发表的关于肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)外源性危险因素的分析性研究进行评估。参照国家学会所采用的分类系统,制定了用于评估文献以及根据现有证据类别得出结论的分类系统。明确考虑了确认假定危险因素的作用对公众的影响。有证据支持吸烟是ALS的一个可能(“很可能”)危险因素。吸烟对公众健康有广泛影响,没有任何可取之处,且是一个可改变的危险因素。证据支持以下结论:创伤、体育活动、农村居住和饮酒可能不是ALS的危险因素。循证医学方法不允许在得出这些结论时计算I型或II型错误的大小。新证据可能会改变这些结论。对未来研究的建议包括:在设计未来的验证性病例对照研究时借鉴临床试验方法;考虑采用队列研究,同时认识到这些研究需要更长时间才能取得成果;优先调查对公众健康影响最大的假定危险因素。研究方法的进步可能会为散发性ALS的各个假定危险因素开发出有限的研究周期。