Eils Eric, Rosenbaum Dieter
Funktionsbereich Bewegungsanalytik (Movement Analysis Lab), Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Münster, Germany.
Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Mar;24(3):263-8. doi: 10.1177/107110070302400312.
The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the stabilizing effect of 10 different ankle braces during simulated inversion on a tilting platform. Twenty-five subjects participated in the study (23 +/- 3 yrs, 71 +/- 12 kg, 177 +/- 9 cm). Ten commercially available ankle braces and a trapdoor in combination with a goniometer system that measured hindfoot inversion inside the shoe were used. Inversion was subdivided into a free fall and a maximum inversion phase. Results showed that all braces restricted inversion significantly between 51% and 15% compared to the no-brace condition but distinct differences between models were found. Maximum inversion angle and inversion velocity were lower for those braces that restricted inversion most effectively during the free fall phase. Reaction times of the peroneus longus did not appear to influence the degree of inversion. Relatively constant differences between free fall and maximum inversion angles for all models (between 6 degrees and 10 degrees) and a high correlation between these two parameters suggests that the main function of ankle braces is to restrict inversion during the free fall phase and not at the extremes of motion.
本研究的目的是评估10种不同的踝关节支具在模拟的倾斜平台内翻过程中的稳定效果。25名受试者参与了该研究(年龄23±3岁,体重71±12千克,身高177±9厘米)。使用了10种市售的踝关节支具以及一个活板门与一个测角仪系统,该系统用于测量鞋内后足内翻情况。内翻被细分为自由落体阶段和最大内翻阶段。结果显示,与不使用支具的情况相比,所有支具均能显著限制内翻,限制幅度在51%至15%之间,但不同型号之间存在明显差异。对于那些在自由落体阶段最有效地限制内翻的支具,其最大内翻角度和内翻速度较低。腓骨长肌的反应时间似乎并未影响内翻程度。所有型号在自由落体角度和最大内翻角度之间存在相对恒定的差异(在6度至10度之间),并且这两个参数之间具有高度相关性,这表明踝关节支具的主要功能是在自由落体阶段而非在运动极限时限制内翻。