Poulin R, Mouillot D
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Parasitology. 2003 May;126(Pt 5):473-80. doi: 10.1017/s0031182003002993.
The host specificity of a parasite is not merely a function of how many host species it can exploit, but also of how closely related these host species are to each other. Here, a new index of host specificity is proposed, one that takes into account the average taxonomic or phylogenetic distance between pairs of host species used by a parasite. The index is derived from measures of taxonomic distinctness used in biodiversity studies. It is easy to compute and interpret, ranging from a minimum value of 1 when all host species are members of the same genus, to a maximum of 5, when all host species belong to different classes. The variance of this measure can also be computed, and provides additional information on the taxonomic or phylogenetic structure of the host assemblage. Using data on helminth parasites of Canadian freshwater fishes, we show that the new index, unlike the mere number of known host species, is independent of study effort i.e. the number of published records of a parasite. Although the index and the number of known hosts are not entirely independent statistically, each captures a different aspect of host specificity. For instance, although acanthocephalans infect significantly more host species than trematodes, cestodes or nematodes, there is no difference in the average index value among these 4 helminth taxa, suggesting that the average taxonomic distances between the host species of a parasite do not vary among these higher taxa. We recommend the use of our new index in future comparative studies of host specificity, in particular when the focus is on the evolutionary history of parasites and of their past colonizations of host lineages.
寄生虫的宿主特异性不仅取决于它所能利用的宿主物种数量,还取决于这些宿主物种之间的亲缘关系有多近。在此,我们提出了一种新的宿主特异性指数,该指数考虑了寄生虫所利用的宿主物种对之间的平均分类学或系统发育距离。该指数源自生物多样性研究中使用的分类学差异度量。它易于计算和解释,取值范围从所有宿主物种都属于同一属时的最小值1,到所有宿主物种属于不同纲时的最大值5。还可以计算该度量的方差,它提供了关于宿主组合的分类学或系统发育结构的额外信息。利用加拿大淡水鱼的蠕虫寄生虫数据,我们表明,与仅知道宿主物种数量不同,新指数与研究工作量无关,即与寄生虫已发表记录的数量无关。尽管该指数与已知宿主数量在统计上并非完全独立,但它们各自捕捉到了宿主特异性的不同方面。例如,虽然棘头虫感染的宿主物种比吸虫、绦虫或线虫多得多,但这4种蠕虫类群的平均指数值并无差异,这表明寄生虫宿主物种之间的平均分类学距离在这些较高分类群中并无变化。我们建议在未来关于宿主特异性的比较研究中使用我们的新指数,特别是当重点关注寄生虫及其过去对宿主谱系的定殖的进化历史时。