Gately Stephen, Kerbel Robert
NeoPharm Inc., Department of Translational Medicine, Lake Forest, Ill., USA.
Prog Exp Tumor Res. 2003;37:179-92. doi: 10.1159/000071373.
It is clear that COX-2 plays an important role in tumor and endothelial cell biology. Increased expression of COX-2 occurs in multiple cells within the tumor microenvironment that can impact on angiogenesis. COX-2 appears to: (a) play a key role in the release and activity of proangiogenic proteins; (b) result in the production of eicosanoid products TXA2, PGI2, PGE2 that directly stimulate endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis in vivo, and (c) result in enhanced tumor cell, and possibly, vascular endothelial cell survival by upregulation of the antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and/or activation of PI3K-Akt. Selective pharmacologic inhibition of COX-2 represents a viable therapeutic option for the treatment of malignancies. Agents that selectively inhibit COX-2 appear to be safe, and well tolerated suggesting that chronic treatment for angiogenesis inhibition is feasible [107-110]. Because these agents inhibit angiogenesis, they should have at least additive benefit in combination with standard chemotherapy [111] and radiation therapy [24, 112]. In preclinical models, a selective inhibitor of COX-2 was shown to potentiate the beneficial antitumor effects of ionizing radiation with no increase in normal tissue cytotoxicity [113-115]. More recently, metronomic dosing regimens of standard chemotherapeutic agents without extended rest periods were shown to target the microvasculature in experimental animal models and result in significant antitumor activity [116-118]. This antiangiogenic chemotherapy regimen could be enhanced by the concurrent administration of an angiogenesis inhibitor [116-119]. Trials that will evaluate continuous low dose cyclophosphamide in combination with celecoxib are underway in patients with metastatic renal cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [120]. Given the safety and tolerability of the selective COX-2 inhibitors, and the potent antiangiogenic properties of these agents, the combination of antiangiogenic chemotherapy with a COX-2 inhibitor warrants clinical evaluation [118, 121, 122]. The effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors on angiogenesis may also be due, in part, to COX-independent mechanisms [123-125]. Several reports have confirmed COX-independent effects of celecoxib, at relatively high concentrations (50 microM), where apoptosis is stimulated in cells that lack both COX-1 and COX-2 [126]. More recently, Song et al. [127] described structural modifications to celecoxib that revealed no association between the COX-2 inhibitory and proapoptotic activities of celecoxib [125]. Some of the COX-independent mechanisms for NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors include activation of protein kinase G, inhibition of NF-kappa B activation, downregulation of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-XL, inhibition of PPAR delta, and activation of PPAR gamma. One or more of these COX-independent effects could contribute to the antiangiogenic properties of NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors. In order to take advantage of both the COX-dependent and COX-independent benefits of NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors, will require evaluation of these agents in neoplastic disease settings, using cancer-specific biomarkers. In conclusion, the contribution of COX-2 at multiple points in the angiogenic cascade makes it an ideal target for pharmacologic inhibition. The reported success of selective COX-2 inhibitors in cancer prevention could be related to angiogenesis inhibition [109]. As premalignant lesions progress towards malignancy, there is a switch to the angiogenic phenotype that is subsequently followed by rapid tumor growth [128, 129]. Intervention with angiogenesis inhibitors at this early stage of carcinogenesis has been shown to attenuate tumor growth in transgenic mouse models [130, 131]. The continued dependence on angiogenesis for later stages of tumorigenesis suggests that COX-2 inhibitors also will have clinical utility in the management of advanced cancers.
很明显,COX - 2在肿瘤和内皮细胞生物学中发挥着重要作用。COX - 2在肿瘤微环境中的多种细胞中表达增加,这会影响血管生成。COX - 2似乎:(a) 在促血管生成蛋白的释放和活性中起关键作用;(b) 导致类花生酸产物TXA2、PGI2、PGE2的产生,这些产物在体内直接刺激内皮细胞迁移和血管生成,并且(c) 通过上调抗凋亡蛋白Bcl - 2和/或激活PI3K - Akt导致肿瘤细胞以及可能的血管内皮细胞存活增强。COX - 2的选择性药理抑制是治疗恶性肿瘤的一种可行治疗选择。选择性抑制COX - 2的药物似乎是安全的,并且耐受性良好,这表明长期治疗以抑制血管生成是可行的[107 - 110]。由于这些药物抑制血管生成,它们与标准化疗[111]和放射治疗[24, 112]联合使用时至少应具有相加益处。在临床前模型中,COX - 2的选择性抑制剂被证明可增强电离辐射的有益抗肿瘤作用,而不会增加正常组织的细胞毒性[113 - 115]。最近,在实验动物模型中,标准化疗药物的节拍式给药方案(无延长的休息期)被证明可靶向微血管并产生显著的抗肿瘤活性[116 - 118]。这种抗血管生成化疗方案可通过同时给予血管生成抑制剂来增强[116 - 119]。评估持续低剂量环磷酰胺联合塞来昔布治疗转移性肾癌和非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的试验正在进行中[120]。鉴于选择性COX - 2抑制剂的安全性和耐受性,以及这些药物强大的抗血管生成特性,抗血管生成化疗与COX - 2抑制剂的联合应用值得进行临床评估[118, 121, 122]。选择性COX - 2抑制剂对血管生成的影响也可能部分归因于COX非依赖性机制[123 - 125]。几份报告证实了塞来昔布在相对高浓度(50 microM)时的COX非依赖性作用,在缺乏COX - 1和COX - 2的细胞中可刺激细胞凋亡[126]。最近,Song等人[127]描述了塞来昔布结构修饰,表明塞来昔布的COX - 2抑制活性与促凋亡活性之间无关联[125]。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和选择性COX - 2抑制剂的一些COX非依赖性机制包括蛋白激酶G的激活、NF - κB激活的抑制、抗凋亡蛋白Bcl - XL的下调、PPARδ的抑制以及PPARγ的激活。这些COX非依赖性作用中的一种或多种可能有助于NSAIDs和选择性COX - 2抑制剂的抗血管生成特性。为了利用NSAIDs和选择性COX - 2抑制剂的COX依赖性和COX非依赖性益处,需要使用癌症特异性生物标志物在肿瘤疾病环境中评估这些药物。总之,COX - 2在血管生成级联反应的多个环节中的作用使其成为药理抑制的理想靶点。报道的选择性COX - 2抑制剂在癌症预防中的成功可能与血管生成抑制有关[109]。随着癌前病变发展为恶性肿瘤,会转变为血管生成表型,随后肿瘤迅速生长[128, 129]。在致癌作用的这个早期阶段用血管生成抑制剂进行干预已被证明可在转基因小鼠模型中减弱肿瘤生长[130, 131]。肿瘤发生后期对血管生成的持续依赖表明COX - 2抑制剂在晚期癌症的管理中也将具有临床应用价值。
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2000
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003-10-1
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2001-7
Front Pharmacol. 2018-8-14
Mar Drugs. 2017-10-13
Cancer Biol Ther. 2020-8-2
J Feline Med Surg. 2014-8
Int J Inflam. 2013