Bongiorni M G, Soldati E, Arena G, de Simone L, Capucci A, Galli R, Parlapiano M, Cazzin R, Moracchini P, Leonardi C
Clinical Physiology Institute, Pisa, Italy.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov;15(11 Pt 2):1798-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02971.x.
A multicenter clinical evaluation of Sorin Swing 100, a new SSIR pacemaker with a gravimetric sensor, was performed by seven different centers enrolling a total of 89 patients, 56 men and 33 women, mean age 73.1 years, for pacemaker implantation (73 patients) or pacemaker replacement (16 patients). Pacing mode was VVIR in 73 patients and AAIR in 16. The behavior of pacing rate was evaluated 3 months after the implant by performing a 24-hour Holter monitor, an exercise stress test, and tests for the assessment of mechanical external interference (MEI). A physiological behavior of the paced rate was always observed during Holter monitoring. In 52 completely paced patients mean diurnal, nocturnal, and maximal heart rate were, respectively, 74.9 +/- 5.7 ppm, 58.1 +/- 5.8 ppm, and 113.4 +/- 12.7 ppm; a paced rate exceeding 100 ppm was reached on the average 5.6 times/Holter monitor. In all but two patients the sleep rate (55 ppm) was reached during the night or long resting time. During exercise stress test a direct correlation between the increase in pacing rate and the increase in workload was observed; the mean maximal heart rate reached in 49 completely paced patients was, respectively, 102.8 +/- 9 ppm in 17 patients who accomplished stage 1, 116.2 +/- 13.6 ppm in 28 patients who accomplished stage 2, and 133 +/- 6.7 ppm in 10 patients who accomplished stage 3 of the Bruce protocol. MEI testing never increased the pacing rate over the noise rate (10 ppm over the basic rate). In only seven patients the results obtained suggested to change the nominal set up of the pacemaker.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
七家不同中心对一款配备重量传感器的新型SSIR起搏器Sorin Swing 100进行了多中心临床评估,共纳入89例患者,其中男性56例,女性33例,平均年龄73.1岁,用于起搏器植入(73例患者)或起搏器更换(16例患者)。73例患者的起搏模式为VVIR,16例为AAIR。植入后3个月,通过进行24小时动态心电图监测、运动负荷试验以及机械外部干扰(MEI)评估测试来评估起搏频率的表现。在动态心电图监测期间,始终观察到起搏频率的生理行为。在52例完全起搏的患者中,日间、夜间和最大心率平均值分别为74.9±5.7次/分钟、58.1±5.8次/分钟和113.4±12.7次/分钟;动态心电图监测平均每小时起搏频率超过100次/分钟的情况出现5.6次。除两名患者外,所有患者在夜间或长时间休息时均达到睡眠频率(55次/分钟)。在运动负荷试验中,观察到起搏频率增加与工作量增加之间存在直接相关性;在完成Bruce方案第1阶段的17例患者、完成第2阶段的28例患者和完成第3阶段的10例患者中,49例完全起搏患者达到的平均最大心率分别为102.8±9次/分钟、116.2±13.6次/分钟和133±6.7次/分钟。MEI测试从未使起搏频率超过噪声频率(比基础频率高10次/分钟)。仅在7例患者中,所获得的结果表明需要改变起搏器的标称设置。(摘要截选至250字)