Suppr超能文献

转移性乳腺癌的随机对照多中心III期试验:标准剂量氟尿嘧啶-表柔比星-环磷酰胺(FEC)与密集型FEC(FEC-G)及米托蒽醌-甲氨蝶呤-丝裂霉素C(MMM-G)的比较

Randomized, controlled, multicenter phase III trial of standard-dose fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC), compared with time-intensive FEC (FEC-G) and mitoxantrone-methotrexate-mitomycin C (MMM-G) in metastatic breast carcinoma.

作者信息

Capotorto A M, Pavesi L, Pedrazzoli P, Da Prada G A, Zamagni C, Massidda B, Farris A, Martoni A, Lelli G, Robustelli della Cuna G

机构信息

Divisione di Oncologia, Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IRCCS), S. Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.

出版信息

J Chemother. 2003 Apr;15(2):184-91. doi: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.2.184.

Abstract

The purpose of this multicenter phase III trial was to assess the impact of a time-intensification of FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) and MMM (mitoxantrone, methotrexate, mitomycin C) regimens, supported by lenograstim (G-CSF) on the objective response rate, time to progression and survival of patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic breast cancer (mbc). Women with mbc were randomized to receive as first-line chemotherapy either standard-dose FEC (all doses in mg/m2): arm A (500, 75, 500 every 21 days), or time-intensified FEC-G: arm B (500, 75, 500 every 14 days), or time-intensified MMM-G: arm C (mitoxantrone 10, methotrexate 35 every 14 days and mitomycin C 10 every 28 days), both with support of lenograstim (G-CSF 150 microg/m2/day s.c. for 10 days). All study treatments were administered for six cycles. Eligible female patients were in the 31-70 year range with histologically proven mbc, and measurable or evaluable disease. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed. The overall response rate (CR + PR, intent-to-treat analysis) was significantly improved in the time-intensified FEC-G regimen (69%) in comparison with standard-dose FEC (41%), p=0.002. Time-intensified MMM-G (51%) did not lead to a significant improvement in the response rate. The percentage of complete responses was significantly higher in the FEC-G arm as compared to standard-dose FEC (17% vs. 4.7%; p=0.002). The median duration was longer in the intensified-dose arms without, however, achieving a statistically significant improvement. The median time to progression (TTP), and the median survival time did not differ between the three treatment arms. Grade 3-4 leukopenia was significantly higher (p<0.001) in the standard FEC regimen-treated patients. Thrombocytopenia was significantly higher (p<0.001) in both intensified regimens. Alopecia and mucositis were significantly more frequent in both anthracycline-containing regimens (p=0.003). Other hematological and non hematological toxicities were similar in the 3 treatment arms. The increase of dose-intensity of both FEC and MMM regimens improved activity, but not efficacy as compared to standard FEC regimen in our group of chemotherapy-naive, metastatic breast cancer patients.

摘要

这项多中心III期试验的目的是评估在来格司亭(粒细胞集落刺激因子)支持下,氟尿嘧啶、表柔比星、环磷酰胺(FEC)方案和米托蒽醌、甲氨蝶呤、丝裂霉素C(MMM)方案的时间强化对初治转移性乳腺癌(mbc)患者的客观缓解率、疾病进展时间和生存率的影响。患有mbc的女性被随机分配接受一线化疗,要么是标准剂量的FEC(所有剂量以mg/m²计):A组(每21天500、75、500),要么是时间强化的FEC-G:B组(每14天500、75、500),要么是时间强化的MMM-G:C组(米托蒽醌10、甲氨蝶呤35每14天一次,丝裂霉素C 10每28天一次),两者均有来格司亭支持(粒细胞集落刺激因子150μg/m²/天皮下注射10天)。所有研究治疗均进行6个周期。符合条件的女性患者年龄在31 - 70岁之间,组织学证实为mbc,且疾病可测量或可评估。进行了意向性分析。与标准剂量FEC(41%)相比,时间强化的FEC-G方案(69%)的总缓解率(完全缓解 + 部分缓解,意向性分析)显著提高,p = 0.002。时间强化的MMM-G(51%)未导致缓解率有显著提高。与标准剂量FEC相比,FEC-G组的完全缓解百分比显著更高(17%对4.7%;p = 0.002)。强化剂量组的中位持续时间更长,然而,未实现统计学上的显著改善。三个治疗组之间的中位疾病进展时间(TTP)和中位生存时间没有差异。在接受标准FEC方案治疗的患者中,3 - 4级白细胞减少显著更高(p < 0.001)。在两种强化方案中,血小板减少显著更高(p < 0.001)。在两种含蒽环类药物的方案中,脱发和粘膜炎显著更常见(p = 0.003)。其他血液学和非血液学毒性在3个治疗组中相似。与标准FEC方案相比,FEC和MMM方案剂量强度的增加改善了活性,但未改善疗效,这是在我们这组初治的转移性乳腺癌患者中得出的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验