Suppr超能文献

等密度区值得加上前缀“等”。

Isochores merit the prefix 'iso'.

作者信息

Li Wentian, Bernaola-Galván Pedro, Carpena Pedro, Oliver Jose L

机构信息

Center for Genomics and Human Genetics, North Shore LIJ Research Institute, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.

出版信息

Comput Biol Chem. 2003 Feb;27(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/s1476-9271(02)00090-7.

Abstract

The isochore concept in the human genome sequence was challenged in an analysis by the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (IHGSC). We argue here that a statement in the IHGSC's analysis concerning the existence of isochores is misleading, because the homogeneity was not examined at a large enough length scale and consequently an inappropriate statistical test was applied. A test of the existence of isochores should be equivalent to a test of homogeneity or equality of windowed GC%. The statistical test applied in the IHGSC's analysis, the binomial test, is a test of whether individual bases are independent and identically-distributed (iid). For testing the existence of isochores, or homogeneity in windowed GC%, we propose to use another statistical test: the analysis of variance (ANOVA). It can be shown that DNA sequences that are rejected by the binomial test may not be rejected by the ANOVA test.

摘要

国际人类基因组测序联盟(IHGSC)的一项分析对人类基因组序列中的等容线概念提出了挑战。我们在此认为,IHGSC分析中关于等容线存在的一项陈述具有误导性,因为未在足够大的长度尺度上检验同质性,因此应用了不恰当的统计检验。对等容线存在的检验应等同于对窗口化GC%的同质性或相等性的检验。IHGSC分析中应用的统计检验,即二项式检验,是对单个碱基是否独立且同分布(iid)的检验。为了检验等容线的存在或窗口化GC%的同质性,我们建议使用另一种统计检验:方差分析(ANOVA)。可以证明,被二项式检验拒绝的DNA序列可能不会被方差分析检验拒绝。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验