Cuadrado Antonio, Amat Gaspar, Armijo Juan A
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, University of Cantabria School of Medicine, Avda. de Valdecilla, s/n, E-39008, Santander, Spain.
Pharmacol Res. 2003 Aug;48(2):183-92. doi: 10.1016/s1043-6618(03)00084-7.
We compared the effects of adding a non-protective dose of valproate (VPA) to increasing single doses of felbamate (FBM) with those of monotherapy and vice versa in CD1 mice. Anticonvulsant effects were evaluated against seizures induced by 14 mg kg(-1) of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and by 110 mg kg(-1) of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ), and neurotoxicity by the rotarod test. The study also assessed changes in concentrations of anticonvulsants, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate in the whole brain. VPA increased the potency ratio of FBM against 4-AP (1.94, P<0.05) but not against PTZ. VPA increased the neurotoxicity of FBM (3.30, P<0.05) and the protective index of FBM was, therefore, reduced from 12.0 to 7.0 for the 4-AP model and from 11.8 to 5.2 for the PTZ model; VPA reduced brain FBM, and increased brain GABA in relation to FBM monotherapy. On the other hand, FBM increased the potency ratio of VPA against 4-AP (1.60, P<0.05) but not against the PTZ, and had no effect on the rotarod model. Therefore, the protective index increased from 1.1 to 1.6 for the 4-AP model and decreased from 1.9 to 1.7 for the PTZ model. FBM did not change brain VPA, and changes in brain GABA and glutamate were not clearly related to anticonvulsant effects. In conclusion, although the addition of a low dose of FBM to VPA was beneficial in the 4-AP model, the addition of a low dose of VPA to FBM was not; both combinations were disadvantageous in the PTZ model. This interaction appears to be pharmacodynamic because a pharmacokinetic mechanism was discarded.
我们比较了在CD1小鼠中,给递增单剂量非氨酯(FBM)添加非保护剂量丙戊酸盐(VPA)与单一疗法的效果,反之亦然。针对14mg/kg的4-氨基吡啶(4-AP)和110mg/kg的戊四氮(PTZ)诱导的癫痫发作评估抗惊厥作用,并通过转棒试验评估神经毒性。该研究还评估了全脑抗惊厥药、γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)和谷氨酸浓度的变化。VPA增加了FBM对4-AP的效价比(1.94,P<0.05),但对PTZ无效。VPA增加了FBM的神经毒性(3.30,P<0.05),因此,对于4-AP模型,FBM的保护指数从12.0降至7.0,对于PTZ模型,从11.8降至5.2;与FBM单一疗法相比,VPA降低了脑内FBM水平,并增加了脑内GABA水平。另一方面,FBM增加了VPA对4-AP的效价比(1.60,P<0.05),但对PTZ无效,并且对转棒模型没有影响。因此,对于4-AP模型,保护指数从1.1增加到1.6,对于PTZ模型,从1.9降低到1.7。FBM没有改变脑内VPA水平,脑内GABA和谷氨酸的变化与抗惊厥作用没有明显关联。总之,虽然在4-AP模型中给VPA添加低剂量FBM是有益的,但给FBM添加低剂量VPA则不然;两种组合在PTZ模型中都是不利的。这种相互作用似乎是药效学的,因为排除了药代动力学机制。