Mari Andrea, Stojanovska L, Proietto J, Thorburn A W
Institute of Systems Science and Biomedical Engineering, National Research Council, LADSEB-CNR, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35127 Padova, Italy.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2003 Jul;71(3):269-81. doi: 10.1016/s0169-2607(02)00097-4.
This study presents a circulatory model of glucose kinetics for application to non-steady-state conditions, examines its ability to predict glucose appearance rates from a simulated oral glucose load, and compares its performance with compartmental models. A glucose tracer bolus was injected intravenously in rats to determine parameters of the circulatory and two-compartment models. A simulated oral glucose tolerance test was performed in another group of rats by infusing intravenously labeled glucose at variable rates. A primed continuous intravenous infusion of a second tracer was given to determine glucose clearance. The circulatory model gave the best estimate of glucose appearance, closely followed by the two-compartment model and a modified Steele one-compartment model with a larger total glucose volume. The standard one-compartment model provided the worst estimate. The average relative errors on the rate of glucose appearance were: circulatory, 10%; two-compartment, 13%; modified one-compartment, 11%; standard one-compartment, 16%. Recovery of the infused glucose dose was 93+/-2, 94+/-2, 92+/-2 and 85+/-2%, respectively. These results show that the circulatory model is an appropriate model for assessing glucose turnover during an oral glucose load.
本研究提出了一种适用于非稳态条件的葡萄糖动力学循环模型,检验了其从模拟口服葡萄糖负荷预测葡萄糖出现率的能力,并将其性能与房室模型进行了比较。向大鼠静脉注射葡萄糖示踪剂团注以确定循环模型和两房室模型的参数。在另一组大鼠中通过以可变速率静脉输注标记葡萄糖进行模拟口服葡萄糖耐量试验。给予第二次示踪剂的首剂量连续静脉输注以确定葡萄糖清除率。循环模型对葡萄糖出现的估计最佳,紧随其后的是两房室模型和具有更大总葡萄糖体积的改良Steele单房室模型。标准单房室模型的估计最差。葡萄糖出现率的平均相对误差分别为:循环模型10%;两房室模型13%;改良单房室模型11%;标准单房室模型16%。输注葡萄糖剂量的回收率分别为93±2%、94±2%、92±2%和85±2%。这些结果表明,循环模型是评估口服葡萄糖负荷期间葡萄糖周转率的合适模型。