Giles Thomas D, Bakris George L, Smith David H G, Davidai Giora, Weber Michael A
LSU School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Am J Hypertens. 2003 Jun;16(6):460-6. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(03)00848-3.
Traditional randomized controlled clinical trials are designed to define the specific properties of individual antihypertensive drugs but do not provide full information about their use in clinical practice. To carry out a large-scale practice-based open-label trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in controlling blood pressure (BP) in the community setting, 703 practitioners recruited 2705 hypertensive patients. There were three groups: untreated at the time of study entry with uncontrolled BP (>/=140/90 mm Hg) (N = 1957); treated but uncontrolled on current monotherapy (N = 685); and treated and controlled, but with unacceptable side effects (N = 63). After stopping any previous treatment, patients received telmisartan (40 mg daily) for 2 weeks; the dose was increased to 80 mg if BP remained >/=130/85 mm Hg. Participants were then followed for a further 4 weeks. Blood pressure decreased by 18.9/12.3 mm Hg in the untreated group, by 13.1/7.9 mm Hg in the previously treated but uncontrolled group, and increased slightly by 3.5/1.3 mm Hg in the previously controlled group. Patients not responding adequately to the 40-mg telmisartan dose had an initial BP reduction of 7.3/4.5 mm Hg; titration to 80 mg gave an additional 7.5/5.0 mm Hg reduction and controlled BP (<140/90 mm Hg) in 44% of these titrated patients. Overall, control occurred in 56% of white patients; 52% of black patients (who responded well to dose titration); 60% of patients <65 years; and 46% of patients >/=65 years. Thus, in contrast with the relatively flat dose response effects in controlled parallel group trials, this practice-based trial has demonstrated the value of titrating telmisartan to its maximum dose in patients with inadequate BP responses to the initial dose, and has shown its efficacy across major demographic groups.
传统的随机对照临床试验旨在确定个别抗高血压药物的具体特性,但并未提供其在临床实践中使用的完整信息。为开展一项基于大规模实践的开放标签试验,以评估一种血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)在社区环境中控制血压(BP)的安全性和有效性,703名从业者招募了2705名高血压患者。共有三组:研究入组时未接受治疗且血压未得到控制(≥140/90毫米汞柱)(N = 1957);接受治疗但当前单一疗法未能控制血压(N = 685);接受治疗且血压得到控制,但有不可接受的副作用(N = 63)。在停用之前的任何治疗后,患者接受替米沙坦(每日40毫克)治疗2周;如果血压仍≥130/85毫米汞柱,则剂量增加至80毫克。然后对参与者进行另外4周的随访。未治疗组的血压下降了18.9/12.3毫米汞柱,之前接受治疗但未得到控制的组下降了13.1/7.9毫米汞柱,之前血压得到控制的组则略有上升,上升了3.5/1.3毫米汞柱。对40毫克替米沙坦剂量反应不足的患者,初始血压降低了7.3/4.5毫米汞柱;剂量滴定至80毫克后,血压又额外降低了7.5/5.毫米汞柱,并且在这些滴定剂量的患者中有44%的患者血压得到控制(<140/90毫米汞柱)。总体而言,56%的白人患者血压得到控制;52%的黑人患者(对剂量滴定反应良好);60%年龄<65岁的患者;以及46%年龄≥65岁的患者。因此,与对照平行组试验中相对平缓的剂量反应效应不同,这项基于实践的试验证明了在对初始剂量血压反应不足的患者中将替米沙坦滴定至最大剂量的价值,并显示了其在主要人口统计学群体中的疗效。