• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂在老年高血压患者中的作用。

The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in elderly patients with hypertension.

作者信息

Thomas G Neil, Chan Paul, Tomlinson Brian

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2006;23(2):131-55. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200623020-00004.

DOI:10.2165/00002512-200623020-00004
PMID:16536636
Abstract

Hypertension is a major risk factor for stroke and coronary events in elderly people and clinical trials have shown that treatment of hypertension with various drugs can result in a substantial reduction in cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. The angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists are the newest class of antihypertensive agents to be used widely in clinical practice. AT1 receptor antagonists can generally be given once-daily. They are also extremely well tolerated with minimal first-dose hypotension and an incidence of adverse effects similar to that seen with placebo. Adverse event rates are significantly lower than with other classes of antihypertensive drugs including ACE inhibitors. These factors result in improved compliance and increased rates of continuance on therapy. AT1 receptor antagonists show similar efficacy in lowering blood pressure to other classes of antihypertensive agents and their antihypertensive effect is potentiated when they are given concomitantly with low-dose thiazide diuretics. AT1 receptor antagonists are eliminated predominantly by the hepatic route but most are not subject to extensive metabolism and interactions with other drugs are uncommon. This is an advantage in the elderly, who are often receiving multiple medications which increases the risk for adverse drug interactions. Dose adjustments are not usually required in the elderly unless there is plasma volume depletion. Although plasma AT1 receptor antagonist concentrations are generally higher in the elderly than in younger subjects, this pharmacokinetic difference may be balanced by decreased activation of the circulating renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the elderly. Recent clinical studies in high-risk hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy or in patients with diabetic nephropathy or heart failure have demonstrated that AT1 receptor antagonists can improve clinical outcomes to a similar or sometimes greater extent than other antihypertensive agents. Many of these studies have included large numbers of older patients and have confirmed the excellent tolerability profile of these drugs. Thus, AT1 receptor antagonists should be considered as a possible first-line treatment or as a component of combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria or nephropathy and as an alternative or additional treatment to ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction. AT1 receptor antagonists also appear to reduce the onset of new diabetes compared with some other antihypertensive drugs. The benefits in terms of organ protection have mainly been seen in studies using higher doses of particular AT1 receptor antagonists and it is not certain at present whether these results can be extrapolated to other members of the class. As the elderly are more likely to have developed organ damage related to hypertension or to have heart failure or diabetes as concomitant conditions, AT1 receptor antagonists represent an appropriate option for many elderly patients. The main disadvantage of these drugs is the cost of the medication but this may be offset by their improved tolerability with fewer adverse reactions and thus increased compliance, resulting in better blood pressure control and fewer clinical events. Overall, AT1 receptor antagonists are well tolerated and efficacious for blood pressure-lowering when given as a single daily dose in elderly patients and have many potential benefits in high-risk hypertensive subjects.

摘要

高血压是老年人中风和冠心病事件的主要危险因素,临床试验表明,使用各种药物治疗高血压可大幅降低脑血管和心血管事件的发生率。血管紧张素II 1型(AT1)受体拮抗剂是临床实践中广泛使用的最新一类抗高血压药物。AT1受体拮抗剂通常每日服用一次。它们的耐受性也非常好,首剂低血压轻微,不良反应发生率与安慰剂相似。不良事件发生率明显低于包括ACE抑制剂在内的其他类抗高血压药物。这些因素导致依从性提高和治疗持续率增加。AT1受体拮抗剂在降低血压方面与其他类抗高血压药物显示出相似的疗效,当与小剂量噻嗪类利尿剂联合使用时,其降压作用会增强。AT1受体拮抗剂主要通过肝脏途径消除,但大多数药物不会发生广泛代谢,与其他药物的相互作用也不常见。这对老年人来说是一个优势,因为他们通常同时服用多种药物,这增加了药物不良相互作用的风险。除非存在血浆容量减少的情况,老年人通常不需要调整剂量。尽管老年人血浆中AT1受体拮抗剂的浓度通常高于年轻受试者,但这种药代动力学差异可能会被老年人循环肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统激活减少所平衡。最近在患有左心室肥厚的高危高血压患者、糖尿病肾病患者或心力衰竭患者中的临床研究表明,AT1受体拮抗剂在改善临床结局方面与其他抗高血压药物相似,有时甚至更好。这些研究中有许多纳入了大量老年患者,并证实了这些药物具有良好的耐受性。因此,AT1受体拮抗剂应被视为2型糖尿病合并微量白蛋白尿或肾病患者一线治疗的可能选择或联合治疗方案中的一个组成部分,以及心力衰竭或左心室功能障碍患者ACE抑制剂的替代或附加治疗药物。与其他一些抗高血压药物相比,AT1受体拮抗剂似乎还能减少新发糖尿病的发生。在器官保护方面的益处主要见于使用特定AT1受体拮抗剂高剂量的研究,目前尚不确定这些结果是否能外推至该类别的其他药物。由于老年人更有可能出现与高血压相关的器官损害或伴有心力衰竭或糖尿病,AT1受体拮抗剂对许多老年患者来说是一个合适的选择。这些药物的主要缺点是药物成本,但这可能会被其更好的耐受性、更少不良反应以及由此提高的依从性所抵消,从而实现更好的血压控制和更少的临床事件。总体而言,AT1受体拮抗剂在老年患者中每日单次给药时耐受性良好且降压有效,对高危高血压患者有许多潜在益处。

相似文献

1
The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in elderly patients with hypertension.血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂在老年高血压患者中的作用。
Drugs Aging. 2006;23(2):131-55. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200623020-00004.
2
Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension.血管紧张素II(AT1)受体阻滞剂在高血压治疗中的临床药代动力学
J Hum Hypertens. 2000 Apr;14 Suppl 1:S73-86. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000991.
3
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade: high hopes sent back to reality?血管紧张素II 1型受体阻断:厚望重归现实?
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Dec;57(6):773-85.
4
[Angiotensin II receptor blockers--evidence along the cardiovascular continuum].[血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂——心血管全程的证据]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2005 Apr 13;94(15):581-94. doi: 10.1024/0369-8394.94.15.581.
5
Goals of antihypertensive therapy.抗高血压治疗的目标。
Drugs. 1995 Feb;49(2):161-75. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549020-00002.
6
Effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibition on end-organ protection: can we do better?肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制对靶器官保护的作用:我们能否做得更好?
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1803-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.019.
7
Valsartan: more than a decade of experience.缬沙坦:十余年的经验。
Drugs. 2009;69(17):2393-414. doi: 10.2165/11319460-000000000-00000.
8
9
Fixed-dose combination antihypertensives and reduction in target organ damage: are they all the same?固定剂量复方抗高血压药物与靶器官损害的减少:它们都一样吗?
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2007;7(6):413-22. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200707060-00004.
10
Renal protection in hypertensive patients: selection of antihypertensive therapy.高血压患者的肾脏保护:抗高血压治疗的选择
Drugs. 2005;65 Suppl 2:29-39. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565002-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
The renin-angiotensin system and cardiovascular autonomic control in aging.肾素-血管紧张素系统与衰老中心血管自主控制。
Peptides. 2022 Apr;150:170733. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2021.170733. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
2
Angiotensin-(1-7) Improves Integrated Cardiometabolic Function in Aged Mice.血管紧张素-(1-7)改善老年小鼠的综合心脏代谢功能。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 20;21(14):5131. doi: 10.3390/ijms21145131.
3
Impact of Hospitalization on Antihypertensive Pharmacotherapy among Older Persons.住院治疗对老年人降压药物治疗的影响

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg and 80/12.5 mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪40/12.5毫克和80/12.5毫克固定剂量组合与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪50/12.5毫克固定剂量组合治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压的比较:两项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点(PROBE)试验的汇总分析
Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014.
2
Cardiovascular drug therapy in elderly patients: specific age-related pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and therapeutic considerations.老年患者的心血管药物治疗:与年龄相关的特定药代动力学、药效学及治疗考量
Drugs Aging. 2005;22(11):913-41. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200522110-00003.
3
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2015 Sep;2(3):239-247. doi: 10.1007/s40801-015-0033-6.
4
Effect of prazosin on diabetic nephropathy patients with positive α1-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies and refractory hypertension.哌唑嗪对伴有α1-肾上腺素能受体自身抗体阳性及难治性高血压的糖尿病肾病患者的影响。
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Jan;9(1):177-182. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.2036. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
5
Clinical factors in patients with ischemic versus hemorrhagic stroke in East China.华东地区缺血性与出血性脑卒中患者的临床特征。
World J Emerg Med. 2011;2(1):18-23. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2011.01.003.
6
Olmesartan medoxomil in elderly patients with essential or isolated systolic hypertension : efficacy and safety data from clinical trials.奥美沙坦酯用于老年原发性或单纯收缩期高血压患者:来自临床试验的疗效和安全性数据
Drugs Aging. 2009;26(1):61-76. doi: 10.2165/0002512-200926010-00005.
7
[European Stroke Organisation 2008 guidelines for managing acute cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack : part 2].[欧洲卒中组织2008年急性脑梗死或短暂性脑缺血发作管理指南:第2部分]
Nervenarzt. 2008 Oct;79(10):1180-4, 1186-8, 1190-201. doi: 10.1007/s00115-008-2532-0.
8
Hypertension control in the elderly.老年人的高血压控制
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Jan;10(1 Suppl 1):33-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.08030.x.
9
Pathways involved in the transition from hypertension to hypertrophy to heart failure. Treatment strategies.从高血压到心肌肥厚再到心力衰竭的相关途径。治疗策略。
Heart Fail Rev. 2008 Sep;13(3):367-75. doi: 10.1007/s10741-007-9060-z. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
10
A large scale study of angiotensin II inhibition therapy in an elderly population: the CHANCE study.老年人群中血管紧张素II抑制治疗的大规模研究:CHANCE研究
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(3):317-23. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.3.317.
Angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of myocardial infarction: systematic review.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与心肌梗死风险:系统评价
BMJ. 2005 Oct 15;331(7521):873. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38595.518542.3A. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
4
The diabetogenic potential of thiazide-type diuretic and beta-blocker combinations in patients with hypertension.噻嗪类利尿剂与β受体阻滞剂联合使用对高血压患者的致糖尿病潜力。
J Hypertens. 2005 Oct;23(10):1777-81. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000177537.91527.09.
5
Do angiotensin II receptor blockers increase the risk of myocardial infarction?血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂会增加心肌梗死的风险吗?
Eur Heart J. 2005 Nov;26(22):2381-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi445. Epub 2005 Aug 4.
6
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers for coronary heart disease and stroke prevention.用于预防冠心病和中风的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂。
Hypertension. 2005 Aug;46(2):386-92. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000174591.42889.a2. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
7
Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared with Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES).卒中后发病率和死亡率,依普罗沙坦与尼群地平用于二级预防的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究(MOSES)的主要结果
Stroke. 2005 Jun;36(6):1218-26. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000166048.35740.a9. Epub 2005 May 5.
8
Recent hypertension trials: implications and controversies.近期高血压试验:影响与争议
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Mar 15;45(6):813-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.069.
9
Angiotensin receptor blockers versus ACE inhibitors: prevention of death and myocardial infarction in high-risk populations.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对比:高危人群中死亡和心肌梗死的预防
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Mar;39(3):470-80. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E478. Epub 2005 Feb 8.
10
Angiotensin receptor blockers and myocardial infarction.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与心肌梗死
BMJ. 2004 Nov 27;329(7477):1248-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7477.1248.