Chueh L-H, Chen S-C, Lee C-M, Hsu Y-Y, Pai S-F, Kuo M-L, Chen C-S, Duh B-R, Yang S-F, Tung Y-L, Hsiao Chuhsing Kate
Elite Dental Clinic, Shin Kong Wu Ho Su Memorial Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Int Endod J. 2003 Jun;36(6):416-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00672.x.
To evaluate the current technical quality of root canal treatment (RCT) in Taiwan.
A total of 1085 RCT cases, randomly selected from a large sample and representative of the Taiwanese population from April to September 2000, were evaluated by eight endodontic specialists. The qualitative evaluation of RCT cases was based on two variables: length of the root filling and density of the obturation. A root canal with both adequate filling length (the apical termination of the root filling within 2 mm of the radiographic apex) and complete obturation (no lateral or apical canal lumen visible in the apical one-third of the root canal) was defined as having good-quality endodontic work (GQEW). A tooth was defined as having a GQEW when all its canals were categorized as GQEW.
From a total of 1867 root canals, overfilling occurred in 235 (12.6%), adequate filling length in 1152 (61.7%), underfilling in 466 (25.0%) and no filling in 12 (0.6%). Of the 1867 root canals, 710 (38.0%) demonstrated complete obturation and 1157 (62%) demonstrated incomplete obturation. GQEW was found in 650 (34.8%) root canals and 329 (30.3%) teeth. The percentage of teeth with GQEW in hospital cases (38.1%) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than that in private clinic cases (24.3%). In addition, the frequency of teeth with GQEW in the anterior teeth (40.4%) or in the premolars (33%) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than that in the molars (18.4%).
Approximately 70% of the teeth receiving RCT in Taiwan were either of inadequate filling length or sealing density.
评估台湾地区目前根管治疗(RCT)的技术质量。
2000年4月至9月期间,从大量样本中随机选取1085例具有台湾地区人群代表性的RCT病例,由八位牙髓病专家进行评估。RCT病例的定性评估基于两个变量:根充长度和充填密度。根充长度足够(根充物根尖端位于X线根尖2mm范围内)且充填完整(根管根尖三分之一处无侧支或根尖管腔可见)的根管被定义为根管治疗质量良好(GQEW)。当一颗牙齿的所有根管都被归类为GQEW时,该牙齿被定义为具有GQEW。
在总共1867个根管中,超充的有235个(12.6%),根充长度足够的有1152个(61.7%),欠充的有466个(25.0%),未充填的有12个(0.6%)。在1867个根管中,710个(38.0%)显示充填完整,1157个(62%)显示充填不完整。650个(34.8%)根管和329颗(30.3%)牙齿具有GQEW。医院病例中具有GQEW的牙齿百分比(38.1%)显著高于私人诊所病例(24.3%)(P<0.001)。此外,前牙(40.4%)或前磨牙(33%)中具有GQEW的牙齿频率显著高于磨牙(18.4%)(P<0.001)。
在台湾接受RCT的牙齿中,约70%的根充长度或封闭密度不足。