• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤后康复结局的回顾性评估:功能独立水平的发展与效用

Retrospective assessment of rehabilitation outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and utility of the functional independence level.

作者信息

Schatz Philip, Hillary Frank G, Moelter Stephen T, Chute Douglas L

机构信息

Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19131, USA.

出版信息

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002 Dec;17(6):510-25. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200212000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00001199-200212000-00003
PMID:12802242
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a measure suitable for retrospective analysis of qualitative brain injury outcome data, the Functional Independence Level (FIL), and document its reliability, validity, and utility.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of existing records, with inclusion based on availability of records, and quantitative or qualitative documentation of functional status at a minimum of 1.5 years after injury.

SETTING

Statewide acute and postacute rehabilitation facilities, as part of a State Head Injury Program.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 338 individuals, with documented moderate to severe traumatic brain injury; primarily males ages 16 to 45.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Disability Rating Scale (DRS) at discharge from primary rehabilitation, Living Situation and Functional Independence Level coded from information in postacute rehabilitation reports, at an average of approximately 6 years after injury.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability coefficients for FIL ratings extracted from rehabilitation records, and between retrospective and in vivo assessments were highly significant. DRS scores at discharge from primary rehabilitation predicted a significant amount of variance in FIL scores at an average of 5 years after injury, and DRS scores remained a stable and significant predictor of FIL scores as the time period between discharge from rehabilitation and outcome ratings increased to 10 years after injury. FIL ratings were significantly lower for individuals living in residential facilities than those living with their families, as compared to living alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIL is a reliable and useful tool for retrospective and prospective assessments of rehabilitation outcome. Gains made during primary rehabilitation by people with severe traumatic brain injury are generally maintained at long-term follow up. Retrospective ratings using the DRS and FIL can help guide postacute rehabilitation planning within state or regional head injury programs.

摘要

目的

开发一种适用于对定性脑损伤结局数据进行回顾性分析的测量方法——功能独立水平(FIL),并记录其信度、效度和实用性。

设计

对现有记录进行回顾性分析,根据记录的可获得性纳入研究对象,并对损伤后至少1.5年的功能状态进行定量或定性记录。

背景

作为州脑损伤项目的一部分,全州范围内的急性和亚急性康复设施。

参与者

共有338名有中度至重度创伤性脑损伤记录的个体;主要为16至45岁的男性。

主要结局指标

初次康复出院时的残疾评定量表(DRS),根据亚急性康复报告中的信息编码的生活状况和功能独立水平,平均在损伤后约6年。

结果

从康复记录中提取的FIL评分的评分者间信度系数,以及回顾性评估与现场评估之间的信度系数非常显著。初次康复出院时的DRS评分预测了损伤后平均5年FIL评分的大量变异,并且随着从康复出院到结局评定的时间间隔增加到损伤后10年,DRS评分仍然是FIL评分的稳定且显著的预测指标。与独自生活相比,居住在寄宿设施中的个体的FIL评分显著低于与家人同住的个体。

结论

FIL是一种用于康复结局回顾性和前瞻性评估的可靠且有用的工具。重度创伤性脑损伤患者在初次康复期间取得的进展在长期随访中通常得以维持。使用DRS和FIL进行回顾性评分可帮助指导州或地区脑损伤项目内的亚急性康复计划。

相似文献

1
Retrospective assessment of rehabilitation outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and utility of the functional independence level.创伤性脑损伤后康复结局的回顾性评估:功能独立水平的发展与效用
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002 Dec;17(6):510-25. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200212000-00003.
2
Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1-4 year follow-up.脑损伤后长时间意识障碍的恢复自然史:1-4 年随访后住院康复患者的结局。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:73-88. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17707-5.
3
Day-of-injury computerized tomography, rehabilitation status, and development of cerebral atrophy in persons with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的损伤当日计算机断层扫描、康复状况及脑萎缩的发展
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Oct;85(10):793-806. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000237873.26250.e1.
4
Preliminary outcome analysis of a long-term rehabilitation program for severe acquired brain injury.重度获得性脑损伤长期康复计划的初步结果分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Nov;81(11):1447-56. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.16343.
5
Long-term recovery course after traumatic brain injury: a comparison of the functional independence measure and disability rating scale.创伤性脑损伤后的长期恢复过程:功能独立性测量与残疾评定量表的比较
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001 Aug;16(4):318-29. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200108000-00003.
6
Early versus later admission to postacute rehabilitation: impact on functional outcome after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后早期与晚期进入急性后期康复治疗:对功能结局的影响
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Mar;87(3):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.028.
7
Predictors of short-term outcome in brain-injured patients with disorders of consciousness.意识障碍的脑损伤患者短期预后的预测因素。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:63-72. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17706-3.
8
Treatment effect versus pretreatment recovery in persons with traumatic brain injury: a study regarding the effectiveness of postacute rehabilitation.颅脑损伤患者的治疗效果与治疗前恢复情况:一项关于急性后期康复效果的研究。
PM R. 2013 Apr;5(4):319-27; quiz 327. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
9
Functional Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Outpatient Rehabilitation Program for Patients with Malignant Brain Tumors.针对恶性脑肿瘤患者的跨学科门诊康复项目的功能结局
PM R. 2018 Sep;10(9):926-933. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
Comparison of the Community Integration Questionnaire, the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique, and the Disability Rating Scale in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤中社区融合问卷、克雷格障碍评估与报告技术及残疾评定量表的比较
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002 Dec;17(6):497-509. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200212000-00002.