Ascenti Giorgio, Zimbaro Giovanni, Mazziotti Silvio, Chimenz Roberto, Baldari Sergio, Fede Carmelo
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Messina, via Consolare Valeria-Gazzi, 98100, Messina, Italy.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2003 Aug;18(8):768-71. doi: 10.1007/s00467-003-1130-4. Epub 2003 Jun 11.
Our aim was to compare contrast-enhanced color Doppler voiding urosonography (VUS) and direct radionuclide voiding cystography (DRVC) to determine the usefulness of ultrasonography (US) in the detection and grading of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). In this study, the two techniques were performed simultaneously on a group of 64 children referred for the evaluation of VUR. DRVC detected VUR in 54/128 ureterorenal units, and VUS confirmed reflux in 44 (81%). Only in two cases was the reflux not confirmed by DRVC (97% specificity). Ten units with minimal grade I VUR detected by DRVC were not identified by VUS. For identification of grade II and III reflux, sensitivity of VUS reached 100%. Ten units with grade I VUR at DRVC presented grade II at VUS. Eleven units with grade II VUR at DRVC presented grade III at VUS. In conclusion, contrast-enhanced VUS is a useful diagnostic tool for the detection of VUR in children. Our data suggest a higher diagnostic accuracy of urosonography compared to radionuclide cystography in the determination of the grade of VUR; this may have significant consequences on the management of young patients affected by VUR.
我们的目的是比较对比增强彩色多普勒排尿期超声检查(VUS)和直接放射性核素排尿膀胱造影(DRVC),以确定超声检查(US)在检测和分级膀胱输尿管反流(VUR)中的实用性。在本研究中,对一组因评估VUR而转诊的64名儿童同时进行了这两种技术检查。DRVC在128个输尿管肾单位中检测到54个存在VUR,VUS证实其中44个存在反流(81%)。仅在2例中DRVC未证实存在反流(特异性97%)。DRVC检测到的10个I级轻度VUR单位未被VUS识别。对于识别II级和III级反流,VUS的敏感性达到100%。DRVC显示为I级VUR的10个单位在VUS中显示为II级。DRVC显示为II级VUR的11个单位在VUS中显示为III级。总之,对比增强VUS是检测儿童VUR的一种有用的诊断工具。我们的数据表明,在确定VUR分级方面,超声检查比放射性核素膀胱造影具有更高的诊断准确性;这可能对受VUR影响的年轻患者的管理产生重大影响。