• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Question hard, answer simply: a comment on Storms et al. (2003).

作者信息

Takane Yoshio

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):321-2; discussion 323-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.321.

DOI:10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.321
PMID:12803442
Abstract

It seems clear that, for whatever reasons, the dementia of the Alzheimer type patient group (as well as other patient groups) exhibits behavior that is different from the normal control group. G. Storms, T. Dirikx, J. Saerens, S. Verstraeten, and P. P. De Deyn (2003) rightfully argue that the observed behavior (similarity judgments) does not tell us the source (cause) of the differences between the 2 groups. Rather, the focus of the study should be placed more on finding the ways the 2 groups are different. They also point out various methodological problems in some of the previous attempts to characterize the nature of the differences. Further methodological issues in G. Storms et al.'s study are examined.

摘要

相似文献

1
Question hard, answer simply: a comment on Storms et al. (2003).
Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):321-2; discussion 323-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.321.
2
Is there madness in the method? A comment on Storms et al. (2003).
Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):318-20; discussion 323-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.318.
3
New directions in the study of semantic deficits: a comment on Storms et al. (2003).
Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):315-7; discussion 323-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.315.
4
Structure versus processing deficits in Alzheimer's disease, a matter of degree: a comment on Storms et al. (2003).
Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):306-9; discussion 323-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.306.
5
Taking the thumbs off the multidimensional scales in the debate on semantic memory and Alzheimer's disease: a comment on Storms et al. (2003).
Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):312-4; discussion 323-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.312.
6
Things aren't as bad as they seem: a comment on Storms et al. (2003).
Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):302-5; discussion 323-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.302.
7
What are the causes of reduced fit in scaling and clustering studies of semantic proximity data, and how else to measure them: a comment on Storms et al. (2003).
Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):310-1; discussion 323-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.310.
8
On the use of scaling and clustering in the study of semantic deficits.
Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):289-301. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.289.
9
RT and non-RT methodology for semantic priming research with Alzheimer's disease patients: a critical review.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002 Oct;24(7):883-911. doi: 10.1076/jcen.24.7.883.8384.
10
Priming deficits in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type.阿尔茨海默型痴呆患者的启动缺陷。
Psychol Med. 1994 Nov;24(4):987-93. doi: 10.1017/s003329170002907x.