Suppr超能文献

固定正畸托槽用粘合剂。

Adhesives for fixed orthodontic brackets.

作者信息

Mandall N A, Millett D T, Mattick C R, Hickman J, Macfarlane T V, Worthington H V

机构信息

Orthodontics, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, UK, M15 6FH.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD002282. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002282.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bonding of orthodontic brackets to teeth is important to enable effective and efficient treatment with fixed appliances. The problem is bracket failure during treatment which increases operator chairside time and lengthens treatment time. A prolonged treatment is likely to increase the oral health risks of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances one of which is irreversible enamel decalcification.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of different orthodontic adhesives for bonding.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE. Date of most recent searches: August 2002 (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2002).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing two different adhesive groups. Participants were patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. The interventions were adhesives that bonded stainless steel brackets to all teeth except the molars. The primary outcome was debond or bracket failure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were recorded on decalcification as a secondary outcome, if present. Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures and results were extracted in duplicate by pairs of reviewers (Nicky Mandall (NM) and Rye Mattick (CRM); Declan Millett (DTM) and Joy Hickman (JH2)). Since the data were not presented in a form that was amenable to meta-analysis, the results of the review are presented in narrative form only.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials satisfied the inclusion criteria. A chemical cured composite was compared with a light cure composite (one trial), a conventional glass ionomer cement (one trial) and a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) (one trial). The quality of the trial reports was generally poor.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to draw any conclusions from this review, however, suggestions are made for methods of improving future research involving orthodontic adhesives.

摘要

背景

正畸托槽与牙齿的粘结对于使用固定矫治器进行有效且高效的治疗至关重要。问题在于治疗过程中托槽脱落,这会增加术者在患者椅旁的时间并延长治疗时间。延长的治疗可能会增加使用固定矫治器进行正畸治疗的口腔健康风险,其中之一就是不可逆的牙釉质脱矿。

目的

评估不同正畸粘结剂粘结的有效性。

检索策略

电子数据库:Cochrane口腔健康组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)和荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)。最近检索日期:2002年8月(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2002年第2期)。

入选标准

若试验符合以下标准则被选中:比较两种不同粘结剂组的随机对照试验(RCT)和对照临床试验(CCT)。参与者为佩戴固定正畸矫治器的患者。干预措施为将不锈钢托槽粘结到除磨牙外所有牙齿上的粘结剂。主要结局为脱粘或托槽脱落。

数据收集与分析

若有记录,则将脱矿作为次要结局进行记录。关于方法、参与者、干预措施、结局指标和结果的信息由成对的评审员(尼基·曼德尔(NM)和赖伊·马蒂克(CRM);德克兰·米利特(DTM)和乔伊·希克曼(JH2))进行一式两份的提取。由于数据并非以适合进行荟萃分析的形式呈现,因此本综述结果仅以叙述形式呈现。

主要结果

三项试验符合纳入标准。将化学固化复合树脂与光固化复合树脂进行了比较(一项试验),与传统玻璃离子水门汀进行了比较(一项试验),以及与聚酸改性树脂复合体(compomer)进行了比较(一项试验)。试验报告的质量总体较差。

综述作者结论

本综述难以得出任何结论,不过,针对改进未来涉及正畸粘结剂的研究方法提出了建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验