• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养老院便秘护理的时间和经济成本。

Time and economic cost of constipation care in nursing homes.

作者信息

Frank Lori, Schmier Jordana, Kleinman Leah, Siddique Reshmi, Beck Cornelia, Schnelle John, Rothman Margaret

机构信息

MEDTAP International, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2002 Jul-Aug;3(4):215-23. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000019536.75245.86.

DOI:10.1097/01.JAM.0000019536.75245.86
PMID:12807641
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Chronic constipation is a common disorder among residents in long-term care; yet the cost to the nursing home of constipation-related care is not known. The objective of this study was to quantify the nursing staff and supply-related cost of constipation care to nursing homes from the perspective of the nursing home.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational time-and-motion design.

SETTING

Two United States nursing homes.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 59 nursing home residents with chronic constipation and nursing staff providing constipation care to them.

MEASUREMENTS

Actual time to complete constipation care-related tasks was measured via stopwatch by trained observers, and the number and professional level (eg, staff nurse, CNA) of staff performing each task was recorded. Frequency of constipation care task data was obtained through 60-day retrospective medical chart review for each subject. Nurse wage rate data was obtained from the Nursing Home Salary and Benefits Report, a US-based national source. Resident and nursing home descriptive information was also collected.

RESULTS

The average cost per task occurrence ranged from 0.72 US dollars for enema administration to 1.74 US dollars for oral medication administration. Average nursing staff costs per subject per year were 1577 US dollars for oral medication administration, 215 US dollars for dietary supplement administration, 39 US dollars for constipation assessment, 17 US dollars for suppository administration, and 6 US dollars for enema administration. Based on estimates of frequency of occurrence, the total annual labor and supply cost per long-term care resident with constipation was 2253 US dollars.

CONCLUSION

Nursing staff performance of constipation care-related tasks is time consuming and costly in the long-term care setting.

摘要

目的

慢性便秘是长期护理机构居民中的常见病症;然而,与便秘护理相关的养老院成本尚不清楚。本研究的目的是从养老院的角度量化养老院便秘护理的护理人员和供应相关成本。

设计

前瞻性、观察性时间与动作设计。

地点

两家美国养老院。

参与者

共有59名患有慢性便秘的养老院居民以及为他们提供便秘护理的护理人员。

测量

由训练有素的观察员通过秒表测量完成与便秘护理相关任务的实际时间,并记录执行每项任务的工作人员数量和专业水平(如,注册护士、护理助理)。通过对每个受试者进行60天的回顾性病历审查,获取便秘护理任务数据的频率。护士工资率数据来自《养老院薪资与福利报告》,这是一个美国的全国性数据源。还收集了居民和养老院的描述性信息。

结果

每项任务发生的平均成本从灌肠给药的0.72美元到口服药物给药的1.74美元不等。每位受试者每年的平均护理人员成本为口服药物给药1577美元、膳食补充剂给药215美元、便秘评估39美元、栓剂给药17美元、灌肠给药6美元。根据发生频率估计,每位患有便秘的长期护理居民每年的劳动力和供应总成本为2253美元。

结论

在长期护理环境中,护理人员执行与便秘护理相关的任务既耗时又成本高昂。

相似文献

1
Time and economic cost of constipation care in nursing homes.养老院便秘护理的时间和经济成本。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2002 Jul-Aug;3(4):215-23. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000019536.75245.86.
2
The cost of chronic constipation.慢性便秘的代价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2002 Jul-Aug;3(4):224-8. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000021421.16417.81.
3
Cost analysis of nursing home registered nurse staffing times.养老院注册护士排班时间的成本分析
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 May;53(5):840-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53267.x.
4
SAFE Homes: is it worth the cost? An evaluation of a group home permanency planning program for children who first enter out-of-home care.安全之家:是否物有所值?对首次进入家庭外照料的儿童的集体家庭永久性安置计划的评估。
Child Abuse Negl. 2005 Jun;29(6):627-43. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.05.007.
5
Cost-effectiveness of home-based care versus hospital care for chronically ill tuberculosis patients, Francistown, Botswana.博茨瓦纳弗朗西斯敦地区慢性病结核病患者居家护理与住院护理的成本效益分析
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Sep;7(9 Suppl 1):S80-5.
6
Resident-to-resident elder mistreatment and police contact in nursing homes: findings from a population-based cohort.养老院中住院医生对老人的虐待行为及与警方的接触:基于人群队列的研究结果
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jun;55(6):840-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01195.x.
7
A cost-benefit analysis of external hip protectors in the nursing home setting.养老院环境中外用髋部保护器的成本效益分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Feb;53(2):190-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53102.x.
8
Short-term economic impact associated with occupational needlestick injuries among acute care nurses.急性护理护士职业针刺伤造成的短期经济影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Dec;21(12):1915-22. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65286.
9
Is integrated nursing home care cheaper than traditional care? A cost comparison.综合养老院护理比传统护理更便宜吗?一项成本比较。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Dec;45(12):1764-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
10
Increased use of hip protectors in nursing homes: economic analysis of a cluster randomized, controlled trial.养老院中髋部保护器使用的增加:一项整群随机对照试验的经济分析
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Dec;53(12):2153-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00490.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Persian version of the Constipation Severity Instrument.便秘严重程度量表波斯语版本的翻译、文化调适、信度及效度
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2024;17(2):198-205. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v17i2.2867.
2
Benefits of a digital health technology for older nursing home residents. A de-novo cost-effectiveness model for digital health technologies to aid in the assessment of toileting and containment care needs.数字健康技术对老年养老院居民的益处。一种用于数字健康技术的全新成本效益模型,用于辅助评估如厕和约束护理需求。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0295846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295846. eCollection 2024.
3
The Burden and Treatment of Chronic Constipation Among US Nursing Home Residents.
美国养老院居民慢性便秘的负担和治疗。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Aug;24(8):1247-1252.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
4
Functional Constipation and Anorexia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS).社区居住老年人的功能性便秘和厌食症:韩国衰弱与老龄化队列研究(KFACS)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5754. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115754.
5
Constipation and Laxative Use among Nursing Home Patients: Prevalence and Associations Derived from the Residents Assessment Instrument for Long-Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF).养老院患者的便秘与泻药使用情况:基于长期护理机构居民评估工具(interRAI LTCF)得出的患病率及关联因素
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:1215746. doi: 10.1155/2016/1215746. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
6
A nation-wide study of prevalence and risk factors for fecal impaction in nursing homes.一项关于养老院粪便嵌塞患病率及危险因素的全国性研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 22;9(8):e105281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105281. eCollection 2014.
7
Cost savings of reduced constipation rates attributed to increased dietary fiber intakes: a decision-analytic model.膳食纤维摄入量增加所致便秘率降低带来的成本节约:一项决策分析模型
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 17;14:374. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-374.
8
Treatment of constipation in older people.老年人便秘的治疗。
CMAJ. 2013 May 14;185(8):663-70. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120819. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
9
Comparison of a Chinese Herbal Medicine (CCH1) and Lactulose as First-Line Treatment of Constipation in Long-Term Care: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, and Placebo-Controlled Trial.中药 CCH1 与乳果糖治疗长期护理中便秘的一线治疗比较:一项随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照试验。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:923190. doi: 10.1155/2012/923190. Epub 2012 Mar 18.
10
Pharmacoeconomic impact of adverse events of long-term opioid treatment for the management of persistent pain.长期阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的不良反应对药物经济学的影响。
Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(2):73-86. doi: 10.1007/BF03256935.