Morse Stephen J
University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(3):311-28. doi: 10.1002/bsl.538.
This article addresses whether the state has the right to medicate involuntarily a defendant who is incompetent either to plead guilty or to stand trial for the purpose of restoring legal competence. It first presents the constitutional background concerning incompetence and the right of prisoners generally to refuse psychotropic medication. Then the article examines the individual and state interests that must be considered to decide specifically whether the state may involuntarily medicate a criminal defendant solely for the purpose of restoring competence. Although the individual interests are strong, the article contends that the state does have a right to medicate involuntarily defendants charged with most crimes to restore trial competence, and that adequate remedies are available to ensure that medicated defendants receive a fair trial.
本文探讨了国家是否有权在未经被告同意的情况下对无能力认罪或受审的被告进行药物治疗,以恢复其法律行为能力。文章首先介绍了关于无行为能力以及囚犯普遍拒绝精神药物治疗权利的宪法背景。接着,文章审视了在具体判定国家是否仅为恢复行为能力而对刑事被告进行非自愿药物治疗时必须考虑的个人利益和国家利益。尽管个人利益较为重要,但文章认为,国家确实有权对被控大多数罪行的被告进行非自愿药物治疗以恢复其受审能力,并且有适当的补救措施可确保接受药物治疗的被告获得公平审判。