Liu Chien-Ming, Hang Liang-Wen, Chen Wei-Kung, Hsia Te-Chun, Hsu Wu-Huei
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China Medical College Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Am J Emerg Med. 2003 May;21(3):241-4. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(02)42247-4.
We report our experience in using pigtail tube drainage in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax compared with traditional chest tube thoracotomy. One hundred two patients were included and analyzed. Fifty patients were treated with the pigtail tube and 52 patients were treated with the traditional chest tube. The extubation time, mean hospital stay, evacuation rate, and total cost were similar without a significant statistical difference. Among the chest tube group, 15 underwent surgical intervention as a result of delayed resolution and hemopneumothorax; and among the pigtail group, 15 had other procedures for pneumothorax, including chest tube insertion and surgical intervention. This verifies our initial suspicion that the effectiveness of the pigtail drainage system is no less than that of the chest tube. Therefore, when considering ambulatory ability and good patient compliance, the pigtail tube drainage system can be considered as the treatment of choice for spontaneous pneumothorax.
我们报告了与传统胸管开胸术相比,使用猪尾管引流治疗自发性气胸的经验。纳入并分析了102例患者。50例患者接受猪尾管治疗,52例患者接受传统胸管治疗。拔管时间、平均住院时间、排气率和总成本相似,无显著统计学差异。在胸管组中,15例因吸收延迟和血气胸接受了手术干预;在猪尾管组中,15例因气胸接受了其他治疗,包括插入胸管和手术干预。这证实了我们最初的怀疑,即猪尾管引流系统的有效性不亚于胸管。因此,在考虑活动能力和患者良好的依从性时,猪尾管引流系统可被视为自发性气胸的首选治疗方法。