Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico Hospital - Piazza Giulio Cesare n. 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Newborn Services, John Radcliffe Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Jan;179(1):73-79. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03478-6. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
Pneumothorax in newborns can be life-threatening. The traditional treatment of pneumothorax is chest drain placement. Recently, modified pigtail catheter has been proposed as a less traumatic approach despite limited experience in infants. To compare the effectiveness and safety of pigtail catheters versus traditional straight chest drains in term and preterm infants with pneumothorax, in two tertiary neonatal units: Policlinico Hospital in Bari, IT and John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, UK. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 47 newborns with pneumothorax admitted to the two units between October 2009 and June 2017, and treated with either pigtail catheters or straight chest drains. Three newborns (6.7%) were excluded from the study because they were treated with both types of drains. The remaining 44 neonates were included in the analysis. Overall, 56.8% (n = 25/44) of pneumothoraces were drained with pigtail catheters and 43.2% (n = 19/44) with straight drains. No differences in gestational age and birth weight were found. The success rate, defined as complete radiological resolution of the pneumothorax after drainage, was significantly higher in the pigtail group (96.0% versus 73.7%; p < 0.05). Days of drainage, length of hospital stay and duration of respiratory support were not significantly different. Subcutaneous emphysema and drain dislodgement/malfunction occurred only in the straight drain group (0.0% versus 11.1%; p = 0.181). No significant differences in mortality between the two groups were found (28.0% pigtail group versus 26.3% straight drain group; p > 0.05).Conclusion: Pigtail catheters are a safe and effective alternative to traditional chest drains for infants with pneumothorax. What is Known:• Air leaks in newborns can represent an emergency, especially among preterms;• The first treatment in a life-threatening pneumothorax is thoracentesis with needle aspiration or placement of a chest drain.What is New:• Pigtail catheter have been described as an alternative to traditional chest drains;• Pigtail catheters are a safe and effective alternative to traditional chest drains for infants with pneumothorax.
新生儿气胸可能危及生命。传统的气胸治疗方法是放置胸腔引流管。最近,尽管在婴儿中经验有限,但已经提出了改良的猪尾导管作为一种创伤较小的方法。为了比较猪尾导管与传统直胸引流管在足月和早产儿气胸中的疗效和安全性,我们在两家三级新生儿单位进行了研究:意大利巴里的 Policlinico 医院和英国牛津的约翰拉德克利夫医院。我们回顾性分析了 2009 年 10 月至 2017 年 6 月期间在这两个单位接受治疗的 47 例气胸新生儿的病历,并分别采用猪尾导管或直胸引流管进行治疗。由于这两种引流管都治疗了 3 例新生儿(6.7%),因此将其排除在研究之外。其余 44 名新生儿纳入分析。总体而言,56.8%(n=25/44)的气胸采用猪尾导管引流,43.2%(n=19/44)采用直胸引流。两组患儿的胎龄和出生体重无差异。引流后气胸完全缓解的成功率在猪尾组明显更高(96.0%比 73.7%;p<0.05)。引流天数、住院天数和呼吸支持时间无显著差异。皮下气肿和引流管脱出/故障仅发生在直胸引流组(0.0%比 11.1%;p=0.181)。两组死亡率无显著差异(28.0%猪尾组比 26.3%直胸引流组;p>0.05)。结论:猪尾导管是治疗新生儿气胸的一种安全有效的方法,可替代传统的胸腔引流管。已知:• 新生儿气漏可构成紧急情况,尤其是早产儿;• 危及生命的气胸的一线治疗是用针抽吸或放置胸腔引流管进行的胸腔穿刺术。新内容:• 猪尾导管已被描述为传统胸腔引流管的替代方法;• 猪尾导管是治疗新生儿气胸的一种安全有效的方法,可替代传统的胸腔引流管。