D'Hoore A, Penninckx F
Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Clinics Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Colorectal Dis. 2003 Jul;5(4):280-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00497.x.
In the last decade our understanding of pelvic floor function and dysfunction has improved significantly. A more rational diagnostic and therapeutic approach is now possible for the group of patients with constipation due to obstructed defecation (OD).
The review is based on a literature search using the PubMed database focusing mainly on recent literature addressing the subject.
Obstructed defecation occurs in about 7% of the adult population. Different pathophysiological mechanisms, either functional or anatomical, eventually lead to OD. Different tests (defecography, balloon evacuation test, manometry, electromyography, colonic transit time measurementmanometry) play an important role to quantify the problem. These tests are not without problems as abnormal results are also found in asymptomatic controls. Also, there is poor agreement between different tests and a poor correlation with symptomatology. Thus, for most syndromes conservative treatment including biofeedback is appropriate. Surgery can yield excellent results in selected cases.
Validation of scoring systems and quantitative tests is still needed. More uniform and strict criteria for anismus should be applied to make therapeutic approaches comparable. Appropriate selection of patients for surgery is the key to success.
在过去十年中,我们对盆底功能及功能障碍的理解有了显著提高。对于因排便梗阻(OD)导致便秘的患者群体,现在有可能采用更合理的诊断和治疗方法。
本综述基于使用PubMed数据库进行的文献检索,主要关注近期涉及该主题的文献。
排便梗阻在约7%的成年人群中出现。不同的病理生理机制,无论是功能性还是解剖性的,最终都会导致OD。不同的检查(排粪造影、气囊排出试验、测压、肌电图、结肠传输时间测量测压)在量化该问题方面起着重要作用。这些检查并非没有问题,因为在无症状对照者中也发现了异常结果。此外,不同检查之间的一致性较差,与症状的相关性也较差。因此,对于大多数综合征,包括生物反馈在内的保守治疗是合适的。在特定病例中,手术可以取得优异效果。
评分系统和定量检查仍需验证。应采用更统一和严格的确认为盆底失弛缓综合征的标准,以使治疗方法具有可比性。为手术适当选择患者是成功的关键。