Murad-Regadas Sthela M, Regadas Francisco S Pinheiro, Bezerra Carla C Rocha, de Oliveira Maura T Coutinho Cajazeiras, Regadas Filho Francisco S Pinheiro, Rodrigues Lusmar Veras, Almeida Saulo Santiago, da Silva Fernandes Graziela O
1 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine of the Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil 2 Unit of Pelvic Floor and Anorectal Physiology, Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil 3 Unit of Pelvic Floor and Anorectal Physiology, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sao Carlos Hospital, Ceará, Brazil.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Feb;59(2):115-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000519.
Numerous studies have described the use of biofeedback therapy for the treatment of anismus. Success rates vary widely, but few data are available regarding factors predictive of success.
Our aim was to evaluate short-term results of biofeedback associated with diet in patients with obstructed defecation because of anismus and to investigate factors that may affect the results.
Patients were identified from a single-institution prospectively maintained database.
This study was conducted in a tertiary hospital.
Consecutive patients who had obstructed defecation associated with anismus and were treated with biofeedback associated with diet were eligible.
Each patient underwent anal manometry and/or dynamic anal ultrasound. Patients with anismus and were treated with biofeedback associated with diet.
Patients classed as having a satisfactory response to therapy and those classed as having an unsatisfactory response were compared with regard to sex, age, Cleveland Clinic Florida constipation score, functional factors (anal resting and squeeze pressures and reversal of paradoxical puborectalis contraction on manometry), and anatomic factors in women (history of vaginal delivery, number of vaginal deliveries, menopause, hysterectomy, and previous anorectal surgery).
A total of 116 patients were included (75 women and 41 men). Overall, 59% were classed as having a satisfactory response (decrease in constipation score, >50%). Patients with satisfactory responses to biofeedback plus diet did not differ from those with unsatisfactory responses with regard to clinical, anatomic, and physiological factors.
This was not a randomized controlled trial.
Biofeedback combined with diet is a valuable treatment option for patients with obstructed defecation syndrome associated with anismus, and more than half of our patients of both sexes achieved a satisfactory response. Improvement was not related to reversal of paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscles at manometry. Patient sex, age, previous anorectal surgery, anorectal manometry pressures, and vaginal delivery, menopause, and hysterectomy in women did not significantly affect outcome.
众多研究描述了生物反馈疗法用于治疗盆底失弛缓综合征。成功率差异很大,但关于预测成功的因素的数据很少。
我们的目的是评估生物反馈联合饮食对因盆底失弛缓综合征导致排便障碍患者的短期疗效,并调查可能影响疗效的因素。
从一个单机构前瞻性维护的数据库中识别患者。
本研究在一家三级医院进行。
连续入选因盆底失弛缓综合征导致排便障碍且接受生物反馈联合饮食治疗的患者。
每位患者接受肛门测压和/或动态肛门超声检查。患有盆底失弛缓综合征的患者接受生物反馈联合饮食治疗。
将对治疗反应满意和不满意的患者在性别、年龄、佛罗里达克利夫兰诊所便秘评分、功能因素(肛门静息和收缩压以及测压时反常耻骨直肠肌收缩的逆转)以及女性的解剖因素(阴道分娩史、阴道分娩次数、绝经、子宫切除术和既往肛肠手术)方面进行比较。
共纳入116例患者(75例女性和41例男性)。总体而言,59%的患者被归类为反应满意(便秘评分降低>50%)。生物反馈加饮食治疗反应满意的患者与反应不满意的患者在临床、解剖和生理因素方面没有差异。
这不是一项随机对照试验。
生物反馈联合饮食是治疗与盆底失弛缓综合征相关的排便障碍综合征患者的一种有价值的治疗选择,我们的男女患者中超过一半获得了满意的反应。改善与测压时耻骨直肠肌反常收缩的逆转无关。患者的性别、年龄、既往肛肠手术、肛肠测压压力以及女性的阴道分娩、绝经和子宫切除术对结局没有显著影响。