Shokar Gurjeet S
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-1123, USA.
Fam Med. 2003 Jun;35(6):414-7.
The American Board of Family Practice (ABFP) In-training Exam (ITE) is one of the tools used to evaluate both a resident's progress through residency and the program itself. Investigators have examined the ITE's validity and reliability and predictors of resident performance, but no published studies have reported the effects of initiatives to improve residents' performance on the ITE. This study examines the impact of an educational intervention on low-scoring residents' ITE composite scores.
Second-year residents at a university-based program were divided into two groups. The intervention group, who took the educational intervention, all had PGY-1 scores < 400 on their composite score. The control group was comprised of residents scoring > 400 on their composite score as PGY-1s. The educational intervention involved intensive group and independent study.
In the first year of the study, there was an increase in the average composite score of 75 points in the intervention group compared to the control group. In the second year, there was an increase of 72.5 points, but these differences were not significant.
These composite score changes are not significant, and although this educational intervention may have improved confidence among low-scoring residents, it did not clearly improve their scores on the ITE.
美国家庭医学委员会(ABFP)住院医师在职考试(ITE)是用于评估住院医师在住院医师培训期间的进展以及培训项目本身的工具之一。研究人员已经考察了ITE的效度、信度以及住院医师表现的预测因素,但尚无已发表的研究报告改善住院医师表现的举措对ITE的影响。本研究考察了一项教育干预对低分住院医师ITE综合分数的影响。
一所大学附属医院项目的二年级住院医师被分为两组。接受教育干预的干预组,其PGY - 1综合分数均<400。对照组由PGY - 1综合分数>400的住院医师组成。教育干预包括强化小组学习和自主学习。
在研究的第一年,干预组的平均综合分数相较于对照组增加了75分。在第二年,增加了72.5分,但这些差异并不显著。
这些综合分数变化并不显著,尽管这种教育干预可能提高了低分住院医师的信心,但并未明显提高他们在ITE上的分数。