Suppr超能文献

[非骨水泥双接触柄植入术中假体周围骨密度的变化;不同参数的影响——一项为期4年的前瞻性随访]

[Changes of periprosthetic bone mineral density in cementless bicontact stem implantation; influence of different parameters--a prospective 4-year follow-up].

作者信息

Reiter A, Gellrich J C, Bachmann J, Braun A

机构信息

Vulpius-Klinik GmbH, Bad Rappenau.

出版信息

Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 May-Jun;141(3):283-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40171.

Abstract

AIM

This prospective study describes the periprosthetic BMD (bone mineral density) after implantation of the cementless Bicontact stem over a period of 4 years. Additionally, the influence of several relevant parameters like age, sex, BMI (body mass index) and the influence of the stem-size on the periprosthetic BMD course were investigated.

METHOD

Measurement of the periprosthetic BMD in 36 patients (15 female, 21 male) in a prospective longitudinal study over 4 years with DEXA (dual energy X Ray absorptiometry) of the proximal Gruen zones 1 and 7.

RESULTS

We found a good precision of the method in vivo with a CV (coefficient of variation) of 1.04 %. There was a decline of the periprosthetic BMD at the whole proximal stem (ROI 0) of 20 % in the first 6 months. Afterwards there was a significant increase at the lateral stem (ROI 1) of 3.46 %, in contrast no significant change could be found medially, maybe as a result of a more lateral induction of power. The investigated parameters BMI, age and sex had no influence on the relative course of mineralisation. At stem sizes bigger than 15 the decline of BMD was significantly larger than at the stem sizes smaller than 15.

CONCLUSION

DEXA is a sufficiently precise method to investigate periprosthetic BMD. The postoperative periprosthetic course of mineralisation and the extent of BMD loss in the first 6 months after the Bicontact stem is similar to other periprosthetic BMD courses of prosthesis with a similar design. The course of mineralisation in "smaller" stems is obviously more auspicious than the course of "bigger" stems.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性研究描述了非骨水泥型双接触柄植入后4年期间假体周围骨密度(BMD)的情况。此外,还研究了年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)等几个相关参数以及柄尺寸对假体周围骨密度变化过程的影响。

方法

在一项前瞻性纵向研究中,对36例患者(15例女性,21例男性)进行了4年的随访,采用双能X线吸收法(DEXA)测量近端Gruen 1区和7区的假体周围骨密度。

结果

我们发现该方法在体内具有良好的精度,变异系数(CV)为1.04%。在最初的6个月内,整个近端柄(感兴趣区域0)的假体周围骨密度下降了20%。此后,外侧柄(感兴趣区域1)显著增加了3.46%,相比之下,内侧未发现显著变化,这可能是由于更外侧的力传导所致。所研究的参数BMI、年龄和性别对矿化的相对变化过程没有影响。柄尺寸大于15时,骨密度的下降明显大于柄尺寸小于15时。

结论

DEXA是一种足够精确的方法来研究假体周围骨密度。双接触柄植入后假体周围矿化的术后变化过程以及最初6个月内骨密度损失的程度与其他设计相似的假体周围骨密度变化过程相似。“较小”柄的矿化过程明显比“较大”柄的过程更有利。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验