• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗马尼亚版哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A型规范。

Romanian norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.

作者信息

David Daniel, Montgomery Guy, Holdevici Irina

机构信息

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2003 Jan;51(1):66-76. doi: 10.1076/iceh.51.1.66.14066.

DOI:10.1076/iceh.51.1.66.14066
PMID:12825919
Abstract

A Romanian-language version of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A) was administered to 340 subjects (218 females and 122 males) recruited from 1998 to 1999 in Romania. Data were collected from three samples of participants to provide greater heterogeneity within the sample. The results from the Romanian version of the HGSHS:A were compared to those from Australian, Canadian, Danish, Finnish, German, Italian, Spanish, and original U.S. samples. The Romanian normative data are consistent with earlier normative studies in score distribution, item difficulty levels, and reliability. The mean score of the Romanian sample did not differ from those in the German and Italian samples but did significantly differ from the remaining samples. The total score reliability (.71) and item reliability of the Romanian sample was also comparable with published reference samples. No differences between women and men were found.

摘要

1998年至1999年期间,在罗马尼亚招募了340名受试者(218名女性和122名男性),对其施测了罗马尼亚语版的哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A式(HGSHS:A)。从三组参与者样本中收集数据,以使样本具有更大的异质性。将罗马尼亚语版HGSHS:A的结果与澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、芬兰、德国、意大利、西班牙以及美国原始样本的结果进行了比较。罗马尼亚的常模数据在分数分布、项目难度水平和信度方面与早期的常模研究一致。罗马尼亚样本的平均分数与德国和意大利样本的平均分数没有差异,但与其余样本有显著差异。罗马尼亚样本的总分信度(.71)和项目信度也与已发表的参考样本相当。未发现男女之间存在差异。

相似文献

1
Romanian norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.罗马尼亚版哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A型规范。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2003 Jan;51(1):66-76. doi: 10.1076/iceh.51.1.66.14066.
2
Israeli norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2008 Oct;56(4):384-93. doi: 10.1080/00207140802255385.
3
Finnish norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1999 Jul;47(3):227-35. doi: 10.1080/00207149908410034.
4
Danish norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1996 Apr;44(2):140-52. doi: 10.1080/00207149608416076.
5
Swedish norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2003 Oct;51(4):348-56. doi: 10.1076/iceh.51.4.348.16414.
6
Italian norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.《哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A版》的意大利常模。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2000 Jan;48(1):44-55. doi: 10.1080/00207140008410360.
7
Norms for the Korean version of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A版韩文版常模。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2009 Jan;57(1):117-26. doi: 10.1080/00207140802463799.
8
Polish norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.波兰版哈佛群体催眠感受性量表 A 式的常模。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2010 Oct;58(4):433-43. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2010.499345.
9
Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.斯坦福催眠感受性量表C型的意大利常模。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2000 Jul;48(3):315-23. doi: 10.1080/00207140008415249.
10
Spanish norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A式的西班牙常模。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1989 Jul;37(3):264-73. doi: 10.1080/00207148908414477.

引用本文的文献

1
Disseminating hypnosis to health care settings: Applying the RE-AIM framework.将催眠术推广至医疗环境:应用RE-AIM框架
Psychol Conscious (Wash D C). 2014 Jun;1(2):213-228. doi: 10.1037/cns0000012.
2
The impact of hypnotic suggestibility in clinical care settings.催眠暗示在临床护理环境中的影响。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2011 Jul;59(3):294-309. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2011.570656.