Ethics of clinical trials from bayesian perspective: medical decision making should use posteriors, not priors.
作者信息
Frankel Stephen, Sterne Jonathan, Ebrahim Shah
出版信息
BMJ. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1456. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1456-a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Ethics of clinical trials from bayesian perspective: medical decision making should use posteriors, not priors.从贝叶斯视角看临床试验伦理：医学决策应使用后验概率，而非先验概率。
BMJ. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1456. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1456-a.
2
Ethics of clinical trials from bayesian perspective: patients make fully informed choices about entry to trials.从贝叶斯视角看临床试验伦理：患者对参与试验做出充分知情的选择。
BMJ. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1457. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1457.
3
Ethics of clinical trials from bayesian perspective: society's role is important.贝叶斯视角下的临床试验伦理：社会的作用至关重要。
BMJ. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1456-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1456-b.
4
Ethics of clinical trials from a bayesian and decision analytic perspective: whose equipoise is it anyway?从贝叶斯和决策分析角度看临床试验伦理：究竟是谁的 equipoise？
BMJ. 2003 May 3;326(7396):980-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7396.980.
5
Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.理解癌症临床试验参与者参与研究的决策：与知情同意、患者满意度和决策后悔相关的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
6
Trials stopped early: too good to be true?
Lancet. 1999 Mar 20;353(9157):943-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)00379-1.
7
Musings on participation in health research and the recruitment process: it is not always about the numbers.关于参与健康研究及招募过程的思考：并非总是关乎数字。
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb 15;57(1):3-5. doi: 10.1002/art.22484.
8
Clinical and research ethics as moral strangers.作为道德陌生人的临床与研究伦理
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009 May-Jun;57(3):157-64. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0027-8. Epub 2009 May 29.
9
[Count on your beliefs. Bayes--not the P value--measures credence].依靠你的信念。贝叶斯方法——而非P值——衡量可信度。
Lakartidningen. 2001 Jul 11;98(28-29):3208-11.
10
[Attitudes toward and experiences with clinical research among current and potential research subjects].[当前及潜在研究对象对临床研究的态度和经历]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2004 Jun 7;166(24):2343-4.
本文引用的文献
1
Ethics of clinical trials from a bayesian and decision analytic perspective: whose equipoise is it anyway?从贝叶斯和决策分析角度看临床试验伦理：究竟是谁的 equipoise？
BMJ. 2003 May 3;326(7396):980-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7396.980.
2
Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.泌尿外科医生和放射肿瘤学家对临床局限性前列腺癌治疗建议的比较。
JAMA. 2000 Jun 28;283(24):3217-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.24.3217.
Zotero 插件