• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis.边缘骨水平的锥形种植体-基台界面可改善支持骨中的应力分布。轴对称有限元分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Jun;14(3):286-93. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140306.x.
2
Implant-abutment interface: biomechanical study of flat top versus conical.种植体-基台界面:平顶与锥形的生物力学研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2(1):33-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00104.x.
3
A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.两种不同牙种植体的有限元分析:假体、基台、种植体及支持骨中的应力分布
J Oral Implantol. 2008;34(1):1-6. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2008)34[1:AFEAOT]2.0.CO;2.
4
Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis.直径减小的莫氏锥度种植体种植体-基台复合体力学特性评估。非线性有限元应力分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Aug;14(4):444-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00828.x.
5
Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.两种用于即刻负重的牙种植体:有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 May-Jun;17(3):353-62.
6
Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.两种不同颈圈种植体结构对悬臂固定局部义齿下应力分布的生物力学影响。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2011 Nov;69(6):374-84. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.572287. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
7
Influence of abutment screw preload on stress distribution in marginal bone.基台螺丝预紧力对边缘骨应力分布的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):303-7.
8
The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.通过比较圆柱形、根尖锥形、颈部锥形和可扩张型种植体,对骨质疏松颌骨功能状态下模拟种植体进行生物力学分析:三维有限元分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;69(7):e273-81. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
9
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.上颌前部区域不同连接方式、长度和直径种植体生物力学行为的三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):101-10. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4120. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
10
Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.垂直及成角载荷下,“平台转换”和“非平台转换”种植体搭配直基台与成角基台时骨内产生应变的比较:一项有限元分析研究
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):8-13. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114913.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Implant Placement Angulation on Biomechanical Stability Study.种植体植入角度对生物力学稳定性的影响研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1226-S1228. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1692_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a bone-level, 2-piece, internal connection implant system with coronal microthreads over 10 years of follow-up: a retrospective clinical study.一种具有冠部微螺纹的骨水平、两件式、内连接种植体系统10年随访的长期临床和影像学结果:一项回顾性临床研究
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2025 Apr;55(2):153-166. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2401100055. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Simulating the Entire Clinical Process for an Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis: In Vitro Study on the Vertical Implications of Implant-Abutment Connections and Rotational Freedom.模拟种植体支持的固定义齿的整个临床过程:种植体-基台连接的垂直影响及旋转自由度的体外研究
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Aug;10(4):e924. doi: 10.1002/cre2.924.
4
Comparative biomechanics of all-on-4 and vertical implant placement in asymmetrical mandibular: a finite element study.全口 4 颗种植体和垂直植入物在下颌骨不对称部位的生物力学比较:有限元研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 6;24(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04186-w.
5
Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.种植体-基台连接系统及种植体周围骨的三维有限元分析:假体指数对种植体系统中应力分布的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 30;22(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02465-y.
6
A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study.两种不同宏观结构及连接方式的种植体在植入和加载阶段通过假体传递的应变的比较评估:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 16;15(14):4954. doi: 10.3390/ma15144954.
7
Randomized controlled clinical study comparing two types of two-piece dental implants supporting fixed restorations-Results at 8 years of loading.随机对照临床试验比较两种类型的两段式牙科种植体支持固定修复体-8 年负荷的结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Mar;33(3):333-341. doi: 10.1111/clr.13893. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
8
Marginal Bone Loss around Implants with Internal Hexagonal and Internal Conical Connections: A 12-Month Randomized Pilot Study.具有内六角和内锥形连接的种植体周围边缘骨丢失:一项为期12个月的随机试点研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 20;10(22):5427. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225427.
9
A meta analysis for evaluation of marginal bone level changes at dental implants.一项评估牙种植体边缘骨水平变化的荟萃分析。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan-Apr;12(1):13-16. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_179_20. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Three Abutment-Implant Interfaces on Stress Distribution in and Around Different Implant Systems: A Finite Element Analysis.三种基台-种植体界面在不同种植系统及其周围应力分布的比较评估:有限元分析
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;10(4):590-594. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_739_18.

边缘骨水平的锥形种植体-基台界面可改善支持骨中的应力分布。轴对称有限元分析。

A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis.

作者信息

Hansson Stig

机构信息

Research & Development, Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Jun;14(3):286-93. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140306.x.

DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140306.x
PMID:12830797
Abstract

It has been hypothesized that marginal bone resorption may result from microdamage accumulation in the bone. In light of this, a dental implant should be designed such that the peak stresses arising in the bone are minimized. The load on an implant can be divided into its vertical and horizontal components. In earlier studies, it was found that the peak bone stresses resulting from vertical load components and those resulting from horizontal load components arise at the top of the marginal bone, and that they coincide spatially. These peak stresses added together produce a risk of stress-induced bone resorption. Using axisymmetric finite element analysis it was found that, with a conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone, in combination with retention elements at the implant neck, and with suitable values of implant wall thickness and modulus of elasticity, the peak bone stresses resulting from an axial load arose further down in the bone. This meant that they were spatially separated from the peak stresses resulting from horizontal loads. If the same implant-abutment interface was located 2 mm more coronally, these benefits disappeared. This also resulted in substantially increased peak bone stresses.

摘要

据推测,边缘骨吸收可能是由于骨内微损伤积累所致。鉴于此,牙科植入物的设计应使骨内产生的峰值应力最小化。植入物上的载荷可分为垂直和水平分量。在早期研究中发现,由垂直载荷分量产生的峰值骨应力和由水平载荷分量产生的峰值骨应力出现在边缘骨顶部,且在空间上重合。这些峰值应力相加会产生应力诱导骨吸收的风险。通过轴对称有限元分析发现,在边缘骨水平处采用锥形种植体 - 基台界面,结合种植体颈部的固位元件,以及合适的种植体壁厚和弹性模量值,轴向载荷产生的峰值骨应力会出现在骨内更深的位置。这意味着它们在空间上与水平载荷产生的峰值应力分开。如果相同的种植体 - 基台界面位于更靠近牙冠方向2毫米处,这些益处就会消失。这也会导致峰值骨应力大幅增加。