Suppr超能文献

种植体植入角度对生物力学稳定性的影响研究。

The Influence of Implant Placement Angulation on Biomechanical Stability Study.

作者信息

Javiya Piyush, Sawhney Anshul, Gandhi Rucha, Mansuri Atik Habibbhai, Patel Silica, Mohanty Rajat, Patadiya Hiren Hansraj

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Piparia, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Department of Dentistry, Mahraja Suhel Dev Autonomous State Medical College, Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1226-S1228. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1692_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The angulation of dental implants significantly impacts their biomechanical stability, which plays a crucial role in the long-term success of implant therapy. This study aims to evaluate the influence of different implant angulations on primary stability through an analysis, providing insights into the optimal placement strategies for enhanced stability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 30 implants were placed into standardized synthetic bone blocks to simulate Type 2 bone density. Implants were divided into three groups ( = 10) based on placement angulation: Group A (0° angulation), Group B (15° angulation), and Group C (30° angulation). Each implant was subjected to insertion torque (IT) measurement, and primary stability was evaluated using the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values obtained from a resonance frequency analyzer. The samples were subjected to cyclic loading at 100 N for 500,000 cycles to simulate masticatory forces.

RESULTS

The mean insertion torque values were 45 Ncm, 35 Ncm, and 25 Ncm for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. ISQ values at the time of placement were highest in Group A (75 ± 2), followed by Group B (68 ± 3) and Group C (60 ± 5). After cyclic loading, ISQ values decreased across all groups but remained significantly higher in Group A (73 ± 2) compared to Group B (65 ± 4) and Group C (57 ± 6). The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference ( < 0.05) in primary stability between the groups, indicating that increased angulation negatively affects biomechanical stability.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study demonstrate that implant angulation has a significant influence on biomechanical stability. Implants placed at 0° angulation exhibited the highest primary stability, while angulations of 15° and 30° were associated with reduced stability. Clinicians should carefully consider implant angulation to optimize outcomes, particularly in cases with limited bone availability.

摘要

背景

牙种植体的角度对其生物力学稳定性有显著影响,而生物力学稳定性在种植治疗的长期成功中起着关键作用。本研究旨在通过分析评估不同种植体角度对初期稳定性的影响,为增强稳定性的最佳植入策略提供见解。

材料与方法

在本研究中,将30枚种植体植入标准化的合成骨块中以模拟2型骨密度。根据植入角度将种植体分为三组(每组n = 10):A组(0°角度)、B组(15°角度)和C组(30°角度)。对每个种植体进行植入扭矩(IT)测量,并使用从共振频率分析仪获得的种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)值评估初期稳定性。对样本施加100 N的循环载荷,持续500,000次循环以模拟咀嚼力。

结果

A组、B组和C组的平均植入扭矩值分别为45 Ncm、35 Ncm和25 Ncm。植入时的ISQ值在A组最高(75 ± 2),其次是B组(68 ± 3)和C组(60 ± 5)。循环加载后,所有组的ISQ值均下降,但A组(73 ± 2)仍显著高于B组(65 ± 4)和C组(57 ± 6)。统计分析显示,各组之间在初期稳定性方面存在显著差异(P < 0.05),表明角度增加会对生物力学稳定性产生负面影响。

结论

本研究结果表明,种植体角度对生物力学稳定性有显著影响。以0°角度植入的种植体表现出最高的初期稳定性,而15°和30°的角度则与稳定性降低相关。临床医生应仔细考虑种植体角度以优化治疗效果,尤其是在骨量有限的情况下。

相似文献

1
The Influence of Implant Placement Angulation on Biomechanical Stability Study.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1226-S1228. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1692_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Study on Influence of Implant Placement Angulation on Biomechanical Stability.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1405-S1407. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1926_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
8
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD003878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub5.
9
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD006697. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006697.pub2.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of microbiological profiles of Indian patients with peri-implantitis and periodontitis.
Bioinformation. 2024 Jun 30;20(6):615-619. doi: 10.6026/973206300200615. eCollection 2024.
2
Effectiveness of Miniscrew-Supported Molar Intrusion: A Clinical Study.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S707-S710. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_957_23. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
Platelet-rich fibrin and titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin in endoperio lesion management.
Bioinformation. 2023 Jan 31;19(1):133-137. doi: 10.6026/97320630019133. eCollection 2023.
5
Implications of ChatGPT in Public Health Dentistry: A Systematic Review.
Cureus. 2023 Jun 13;15(6):e40367. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40367. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):585-98. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115251.
9
Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant.
Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):491-501.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验