Thamer Claus, Stumvoll Michael, Niess Andreas, Tschritter Otto, Haap Michael, Becker Regine, Shirkavand Fatemeh, Bachmann Oliver, Rett Kristian, Volk Annette, Häring Hans, Fritsche Andreas
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Diabetes Care. 2003 Jul;26(7):2126-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.7.2126.
Studies on insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in subjects with a familial predisposition for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) traditionally produce inconsistent results. This may be due to small sample size, subject selection, matching procedures, and perhaps lack of a measure of physical fitness.
In the present study, we specifically tested the hypothesis that a family history of T2DM is associated with reduced VO(2max), measured by incremental bicycle ergometry, independent of insulin sensitivity estimated from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; n = 424) and measured by a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (n = 185). Subjects included in the study were young (34 +/- 10 years), healthy, and normal glucose tolerant with either a first-degree relative (FDR) with T2DM (n = 183), a second-degree relative with T2DM (n = 94), or no family history of T2DM (control subjects, n = 147). BMI, percent body fat, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and habitual physical activity (HPA; standard questionnaire) were comparable among groups. FDRs had significantly lower VO(2max) than control subjects: 40.5 +/- 0.6 vs. 45.2 +/- 0.9 ml O(2)/kg lean body mass, P = 0.01 after adjusting for sex, age, BMI, HPA, and insulin sensitivity (euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp).
BMI, percent body fat, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and habitual physical activity (HPA; standard questionnaire) were comparable among groups. FDRs had significantly lower VO(2max) than control subjects: 40.5 +/- 0.6 vs. 45.2 +/- 0.9 ml O(2)/kg lean body mass, P = 0.01 after adjusting for sex, age, BMI, HPA, and insulin sensitivity (euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp). Insulin sensitivity per se was not affected by family history of T2DM after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and percent body fat (P = 0.76). The appropriateness of beta-cell function for the individual insulin sensitivity (disposition index: product of a validated secretion parameter [OGTT] and sensitivity [clamp]) was significantly lower in FDRs (87 +/- 4 units) versus control subjects (104 +/- 6 units, P = 0.02 after adjusting for sex, age, and BMI). Analyses of the larger OGTT group produced essentially the same results.
In conclusion, these data are compatible with the hypothesis that familial predisposition for T2DM impairs maximal oxygen consumption in skeletal muscle. Because habitual physical activity was not different, genetic factors may be involved. Conceivably, reduced VO(2max) precedes skeletal muscle insulin resistance, providing a partial explanation for discrepancies in the literature.
对有2型糖尿病(T2DM)家族易感性的受试者的胰岛素敏感性和胰岛素分泌进行的研究,传统上得出的结果并不一致。这可能是由于样本量小、受试者选择、匹配程序,也可能是缺乏体能测量指标。
在本研究中,我们专门检验了这样一个假设,即T2DM家族史与通过递增式自行车测力计测量的最大摄氧量(VO₂max)降低有关,且独立于通过口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT;n = 424)估计并通过正常血糖-高胰岛素钳夹试验测量(n = 185)的胰岛素敏感性。纳入研究的受试者年轻(34±10岁)、健康且糖耐量正常,他们要么有患T2DM的一级亲属(FDR;n = 183),要么有患T2DM的二级亲属(n = 94),要么无T2DM家族史(对照组,n = 147)。各组间的体重指数(BMI)、体脂百分比、腰臀比(WHR)和习惯性身体活动(HPA;标准问卷)具有可比性。FDR的VO₂max显著低于对照组:分别为40.5±0.6与45.2±0.9 ml O₂/kg去脂体重,在对性别、年龄、BMI、HPA和胰岛素敏感性(正常血糖-高胰岛素钳夹试验)进行校正后,P = 0.01。
各组间的BMI、体脂百分比、腰臀比(WHR)和习惯性身体活动(HPA;标准问卷)具有可比性。FDR的VO₂max显著低于对照组:分别为40.5±0.6与45.2±0.9 ml O₂/kg去脂体重,在对性别、年龄、BMI、HPA和胰岛素敏感性(正常血糖-高胰岛素钳夹试验)进行校正后,P = 0.01。在对年龄、性别、BMI和体脂百分比进行校正后,T2DM家族史本身并未影响胰岛素敏感性(P = 0.76)。FDR组个体胰岛素敏感性的β细胞功能适宜性(处置指数:经过验证的分泌参数[OGTT]与敏感性[钳夹试验]的乘积)显著低于对照组(分别为87±4单位与104±6单位,在对性别、年龄和BMI进行校正后,P = 0.02)。对更大的OGTT组进行分析得出了基本相同的结果。
总之,这些数据与以下假设相符,即T2DM的家族易感性会损害骨骼肌的最大耗氧量。由于习惯性身体活动并无差异,可能涉及遗传因素。可以想象,VO₂max降低先于骨骼肌胰岛素抵抗,这为文献中的差异提供了部分解释。