Baumeister Steffen P, Spierer Roberto, Erdmann Detlev, Sweis Ranja, Levin L Scott, Germann Guenter K
Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jul;112(1):129-40; discussion 141-2. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000066167.68966.66.
The popularity of the sural artery flap has increased markedly throughout the years, and favorable results are reported almost uniformly. Previous publications have mainly presented results of small groups and of predominantly younger patients with posttraumatic defects, or they have reported technical modifications of the sural artery flap. The authors have increasingly used the reversed sural artery flap in a high-risk, critically multimorbid, and older patient population, and in contrast to the results of other authors, a considerable necrosis rate of 36 percent was seen. For the first time, a detailed, critical, retrospective complication analysis of 70 sural artery flaps is presented. The results reveal the following risk factors, which can potentially impair successful defect coverage and thus contribute to flap complications: concomitant diseases, particularly diabetes mellitus; peripheral arterial disease or venous insufficiency, which increase the risk of flap necrosis five-fold to six-fold; and patient age of over 40 years, because of an increased rate of comorbidity, underlying osteomyelitis, and the use of a tight subcutaneous tunnel. However, age alone did not seem to represent a risk factor by itself. Given the results of the analysis, the operative procedure was altered, as follows. In cases in which a lesser saphenous vein cannot be found, a delay procedure is recommended, or the flap is not utilized. In addition, an external fixation device seems to facilitate postoperative care markedly without adding specific complications; it is recommended in most patients. This analysis emphasizes specific risk factors that result in higher complication rates of the sural artery flap, and it leads to more realistic and appropriate expectations for this flap.
多年来,腓肠动脉皮瓣的应用越来越广泛,几乎所有报道的结果都很理想。以往的文献主要介绍了小样本病例以及主要为年轻创伤后缺损患者的治疗结果,或者报道了腓肠动脉皮瓣的技术改良。作者越来越多地在高危、病情严重且合并多种疾病的老年患者中使用逆行腓肠动脉皮瓣,与其他作者的结果不同,我们观察到相当高的坏死率,达36%。本文首次对70例腓肠动脉皮瓣进行了详细、严谨的回顾性并发症分析。结果揭示了以下可能影响缺损成功修复并导致皮瓣并发症的危险因素:合并症,尤其是糖尿病;外周动脉疾病或静脉功能不全,这会使皮瓣坏死风险增加五至六倍;患者年龄超过40岁,因为合并症发生率增加、存在潜在骨髓炎以及使用紧密的皮下隧道。然而,单独的年龄本身似乎并不构成危险因素。根据分析结果,手术操作做了如下改变。在找不到小隐静脉的情况下,建议采用延迟手术,或者不使用该皮瓣。此外,外固定装置似乎能显著方便术后护理且不会增加特定并发症;建议大多数患者使用。该分析强调了导致腓肠动脉皮瓣并发症发生率较高的特定危险因素,并使人们对该皮瓣有更现实和恰当的预期。