Seyama Yasuji, Kubota Keiichi, Sano Keiji, Noie Tamaki, Takayama Tadatoshi, Kosuge Tomoo, Makuuchi Masatoshi
Hepato-Biliary Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Ann Surg. 2003 Jul;238(1):73-83. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000074960.55004.72.
To demonstrate our strategy for hilar bile duct cancer and to elucidate prognostic factors and the surgeon's role in long-term survival.
Extended hemihepatectomy is recognized as a curative treatment of hilar bile duct cancer but is not always safe because of the risk of postoperative liver failure. A safe and beneficial strategy is required.
Fifty-eight consecutive major hepatectomies for hilar bile duct cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Appropriate preoperative treatments, biliary drainage, and portal embolization were performed before major hepatectomies. The short- and long-term results of our strategy are presented and analyzed.
Biliary drainage and portal embolization were performed in 39 patients (67.2%) and 31 patients (53.4%), respectively. Major hepatectomies comprised 27 extended right and 22 extended left hemihepatectomies and 9 hepatoduodenopancreatectomies. Operative morbidity and mortality rates were 43% and 0%, respectively. There was no postoperative liver failure. The overall 5-year survival rate was 40%. Univariate analysis showed that residual tumor status, lymph node involvement, and perineural invasion were associated with patients' long-term survival. A surgical margin over 5 mm resulted in better long-term survival. The delay resulting from preoperative treatment was not detrimental to long-term survival. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement was the only prognostic factor.
Our strategy, which includes preoperative biliary drainage and portal embolization, led to a reduction in the risks associated with major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer, and resulted in zero mortality. Surgeons should aim at complete clearance of the tumor with an adequate surgical margin to ensure optimal long-term survival.
阐述我们针对肝门部胆管癌的治疗策略,并阐明预后因素以及外科医生在长期生存中的作用。
扩大半肝切除术被认为是治疗肝门部胆管癌的一种根治性方法,但由于存在术后肝衰竭的风险,并非总是安全的。因此需要一种安全且有益的策略。
回顾性分析连续58例因肝门部胆管癌接受的大型肝切除术。在大型肝切除术前进行了适当的术前治疗、胆道引流和门静脉栓塞。展示并分析了我们这一策略的短期和长期结果。
分别有39例患者(67.2%)进行了胆道引流,31例患者(53.4%)进行了门静脉栓塞。大型肝切除术包括27例扩大右半肝切除术、22例扩大左半肝切除术和9例肝十二指肠胰切除术。手术并发症发生率和死亡率分别为43%和0%。未发生术后肝衰竭。总体5年生存率为40%。单因素分析显示,肿瘤残留状态、淋巴结受累和神经周围侵犯与患者的长期生存相关。手术切缘超过5mm可带来更好的长期生存。术前治疗导致的延迟对长期生存并无不利影响。多因素分析显示,淋巴结受累是唯一的预后因素。
我们的策略,包括术前胆道引流和门静脉栓塞,降低了与肝门部胆管癌大型肝切除术相关的风险,并实现了零死亡率。外科医生应旨在通过足够的手术切缘完全清除肿瘤,以确保最佳的长期生存。