St George J A
Genzyme Corporation, 31 New York Avenue, Framingham, MA 01701-9322, USA.
Gene Ther. 2003 Jul;10(14):1135-41. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302071.
In September 1999, the perceptions of the use of adenoviral (Ad) vectors for gene therapy were altered when a patient exposed via the hepatic artery to a high dose of adenoviral vector succumbed to the toxicity related to vector administration. Appropriately, concerns were raised about continued use of the Ad vector system and, importantly, there were increased efforts to more fully understand the toxicity. Today it is recognized that there is no ideal vector system, and that while Ad vectors are not suitable for all applications, the significant advantages over other vector systems including efficient transduction of a variety of cell types, both quiescent and dividing, make it optimal for certain applications. These include protocols where high levels of short-term expression are sufficient to provide a therapeutic benefit. Potential target applications include therapeutic angiogenesis, administration into immune-privileged sites such as the CNS, or treatments where the adjuvant effect of adenovirus can be of benefit such as cancer vaccines. Broader applicability of Ad vectors will require resolution of toxicity issues. This review will therefore focus on studies conducted over the last 2 years that have advanced our understanding of the toxicity associated with Ad vectors, studies that have employed methods to reduce toxicity and improvements in Ad vectors themselves that will reduce toxicity by one of several mechanisms. These mechanisms include retargeting vector to the tissue of interest, minimizing or eliminating viral gene expression that is thought to result in loss of transduced cells, or by methods that seek to reduce the vector dose required for therapeutic benefit. An area where there remains significant room for improvement is when readministration of vector is required because transgene expression has decreased to background levels.
1999年9月,一名经肝动脉接受高剂量腺病毒载体治疗的患者因载体给药相关毒性死亡,这改变了人们对腺病毒(Ad)载体用于基因治疗的看法。相应地,人们对继续使用Ad载体系统提出了担忧,重要的是,加大了更全面了解毒性的力度。如今人们认识到,不存在理想的载体系统,虽然Ad载体并不适用于所有应用,但与其他载体系统相比,它具有显著优势,包括能有效转导多种静止和分裂细胞类型,这使其在某些应用中表现最佳。这些应用包括短期高表达水平足以提供治疗益处的方案。潜在的靶向应用包括治疗性血管生成、向中枢神经系统等免疫豁免部位给药,或在腺病毒佐剂效应有益的治疗中应用,如癌症疫苗。Ad载体更广泛的适用性需要解决毒性问题。因此,本综述将聚焦过去两年开展的研究,这些研究增进了我们对与Ad载体相关毒性的理解,采用了降低毒性方法的研究,以及Ad载体本身的改进,这些改进将通过几种机制之一降低毒性。这些机制包括将载体重新靶向到感兴趣的组织、最小化或消除被认为会导致转导细胞丢失的病毒基因表达,或通过旨在降低治疗益处所需载体剂量的方法。在需要重新给药载体因为转基因表达已降至背景水平的情况下,仍有很大改进空间。