Ponce de León Claudia A, DeNicola Katie, Montes Bayón Maria, Caruso Joseph A
Department of Chemistry, McMicken College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0172, USA.
J Environ Monit. 2003 Jun;5(3):435-40. doi: 10.1039/b301108a.
Different techniques have been employed in order to evaluate the most efficient procedure for the extraction of selenium from soil as required for speciation. Selenium contaminated sediments from Stewart Lake Wetland, California were used. A strong acid mineralization of the samples gives quantitative total selenium, which is then used to estimate recoveries for the milder extraction methods. The different extraction methodologies involve the sequential use of water, buffer (phosphate, pH 7) and either acid solution (e.g. HNO3 or HCl) or basic solutions (e.g. ammonium acetate, NaOH or TMAH). Pyrophosphate extraction was also evaluated and showed that selenium was not associated with humic acids. The extractants were subsequently analyzed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) with UV (254 and 400 nm) and on-line ICP-MS detection; anion exchange chromatography, and ion-pair reversed phase chromatography with ICP-MS detection. For sequential extractions the extraction efficiencies showed that the basic extractions were more efficient than the acidic. The difference between the acidic and the basic extraction efficiency is carried to the sulfite extraction, suggesting that whatever is not extracted by the acid is subsequently extracted by the sulfite. The species identified with the different chromatographies were selenate, selenite, elemental selenium and some organic selenium.
为了评估按照形态分析要求从土壤中提取硒的最有效方法,人们采用了不同的技术。使用了加利福尼亚州斯图尔特湖湿地受硒污染的沉积物。对样品进行强酸矿化可得到定量的总硒,然后用其来估算较温和提取方法的回收率。不同的提取方法包括依次使用水、缓冲液(磷酸盐,pH 7)以及酸溶液(如HNO3或HCl)或碱溶液(如乙酸铵、NaOH或TMAH)。还对焦磷酸盐提取进行了评估,结果表明硒与腐殖酸不相关。随后通过配有紫外(254和400 nm)和在线ICP-MS检测的尺寸排阻色谱(SEC)、阴离子交换色谱以及配有ICP-MS检测的离子对反相色谱对萃取剂进行分析。对于连续萃取,萃取效率表明碱性萃取比酸性萃取更有效。酸性和碱性萃取效率的差异延伸到亚硫酸盐萃取,这表明未被酸萃取的物质随后会被亚硫酸盐萃取。通过不同色谱法鉴定出的物种有硒酸盐、亚硒酸盐、元素硒和一些有机硒。