Hurley Susan E, Saunders Theresa M, Nivas Rachna, Hertz Andrew, Reynolds Peggy
Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA, USA.
Epidemiology. 2003 Jul;14(4):386-91. doi: 10.1097/01.EDE.0000073161.66729.89.
Geographic information system (GIS)-based health studies require information on the physical location of data points, such as subject addresses. In a study of California women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1988 and 1997, we needed to locate the residential addresses of 4,537 women with post office boxes (POBs).
We investigated the feasibility of tracing street addresses for the POBs and examined potential selection biases and case attribute misclassifications introduced by different methods of handling POBs in GIS-based health studies.
Our tracing method yielded street addresses for only 34% of POBs in our study. Examination of subjects' case characteristics revealed that boxholders were not representative of the full population. Geocoding using a POB's delivery-weighted five-digit zip code centroid, as a proxy for street address, resulted in case attribute misclassification for 81% of boxholders.
Disease registries should modernize their infrastructure to complement GIS technologies. Epidemiologists should understand GIS data limitations and consider potential biases introduced by incomplete or inaccurate geocoding.
基于地理信息系统(GIS)的健康研究需要有关数据点物理位置的信息,例如受试者地址。在一项对1988年至1997年间被诊断患有乳腺癌的加利福尼亚女性的研究中,我们需要找到4537名使用邮政信箱(POB)的女性的居住地址。
我们调查了追踪POB街道地址的可行性,并研究了在基于GIS的健康研究中,不同处理POB方法所引入的潜在选择偏倚和病例属性错误分类情况。
我们的追踪方法仅为研究中34%的POB找到了街道地址。对受试者病例特征的检查表明,使用邮政信箱者并不代表全部人群。将POB的投递加权五位邮政编码中心作为街道地址的代理进行地理编码,导致81%的使用邮政信箱者出现病例属性错误分类。
疾病登记处应使其基础设施现代化,以补充GIS技术。流行病学家应了解GIS数据的局限性,并考虑不完整或不准确的地理编码所引入的潜在偏倚。