Segonds J-M, Alnot J-Y, Masmejean E
Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003 Apr;89(2):107-14.
Although aseptic non-union of humeral shaft fractures is generally considered to be an exceptional complication, rates in the literature have varied from 1 to 10%. Factors favoring non-union are often related to technical error or inappropriate therapeutic indication. Several types of treatment (orthopedic, locked centromedullary nailing, ascending pinning, plating, external fixation) can be proposed for humeral shaft fractures. In all cases, a precise technique and proper indication are essential for success. We reviewed the cases of 30 patients who underwent surgery for aseptic non-union of humeral shaft fractures between 1995 and 2000.
Mean patient age was 43 years. Oblique and transverse fractures of the middle third of the shaft predominated. All types of treatment had been used but most of the patients had had ascending pinning. All patients were treated with plate fixatin and a cancellous bone graft after identifying the radial nerve.
Bone healing was achieved in all patients. Mean delay to healing was 16 weeks with good motion of the shoulder (mean elevation 136 degrees ) and elbow (mean motion 10-130 degrees ). Transient radial paresia recovered spontaneously in two patients. There was one infection. Only two patients complained of a painful arm that was not bothersome for daily activities and did not require long-term analgesia. There were no cases of radial nerve injury. Elbow function improved in 16 patients, was unchanged in 11, and showed limited extension in 3. Shoulder function improved in 15 patients and was unchanged in 15.
Plate fixation is widely described in the literature for the treatment of humeral non-union. The main complications of this treatment are radial palsy and infection, reported in 5% of the series. Several recent reports have therefore advocated locked nailing or external fixation with an Ilizarov device but these techniques are difficult to use and have their own risks of complications. It is difficult to block rotation and the nail may injure the rotator cuff. Pin tract infection, nerve injury, and prolonged external fixation are other disadvantages. We therefore recommend screw plate fixation with a cancellous bone graft. Our good results combined with the very low rate of complications argue in favor of this therapeutic option.
尽管肱骨干骨折的无菌性骨不连通常被认为是一种罕见的并发症,但文献报道的发生率在1%至10%之间。导致骨不连的因素往往与技术失误或不恰当的治疗指征有关。对于肱骨干骨折,可以采用多种治疗方法(骨科治疗、带锁髓内钉固定、逆行穿针固定、钢板固定、外固定)。在所有情况下,精确的技术和恰当的指征对于成功治疗至关重要。我们回顾了1995年至2000年间接受手术治疗肱骨干骨折无菌性骨不连的30例患者的病例。
患者平均年龄为43岁。以肱骨干中1/3的斜形和横形骨折为主。所有治疗方法均有采用,但大多数患者接受的是逆行穿针固定。在确定桡神经后,所有患者均接受钢板固定和松质骨移植治疗。
所有患者均实现了骨愈合。平均愈合延迟时间为16周,肩关节活动良好(平均抬高136度),肘关节活动良好(平均活动度为10 - 130度)。两名患者的短暂性桡神经轻瘫自行恢复。发生了1例感染。只有两名患者抱怨手臂疼痛,但不影响日常活动,也无需长期镇痛。没有桡神经损伤的病例。16例患者的肘关节功能改善,11例患者的肘关节功能无变化,3例患者的肘关节伸展受限。15例患者的肩关节功能改善,15例患者的肩关节功能无变化。
文献中广泛描述了钢板固定治疗肱骨骨不连的方法。该治疗方法的主要并发症是桡神经麻痹和感染,在系列报道中发生率为5%。因此,最近的几份报告主张采用带锁髓内钉固定或使用伊里扎洛夫器械进行外固定,但这些技术操作困难,且有其自身的并发症风险。难以阻止旋转,髓内钉可能会损伤肩袖。针道感染、神经损伤和外固定时间延长是其他缺点。因此,我们推荐使用松质骨移植的螺钉钢板固定。我们良好的治疗效果以及极低的并发症发生率支持了这种治疗选择。